Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence-based Recovery Colleges: developing a typology based on organisational characteristics, fidelity and funding.
Hayes, Daniel; Camacho, Elizabeth M; Ronaldson, Amy; Stepanian, Katy; McPhilbin, Merly; Elliott, Rachel A; Repper, Julie; Bishop, Simon; Stergiopoulos, Vicky; Brophy, Lisa; Giles, Kirsty; Trickett, Sarah; Lawrence, Stella; Winship, Gary; Meddings, Sara; Bakolis, Ioannis; Henderson, Claire; Slade, Mike.
Afiliación
  • Hayes D; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. d.hayes@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Camacho EM; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. d.hayes@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Ronaldson A; Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
  • Stepanian K; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
  • McPhilbin M; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
  • Elliott RA; School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
  • Repper J; Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
  • Bishop S; ImROC, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Mapperley, Nottingham, NG3 6AA, UK.
  • Stergiopoulos V; Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.
  • Brophy L; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.
  • Giles K; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Trickett S; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
  • Lawrence S; RECOLLECT Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, UK.
  • Winship G; RECOLLECT Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, UK.
  • Meddings S; School of Education, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG2 5BY, UK.
  • Bakolis I; ImROC, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Mapperley, Nottingham, NG3 6AA, UK.
  • Henderson C; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
  • Slade M; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36905435
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Recovery Colleges (RCs) have been implemented across England with wide variation in organisational characteristics. The purpose of this study is to describe RCs across England in terms of organisational and student characteristics, fidelity and annual spending, to generate a RC typology based on characteristics and to explore the relationship between characteristics and fidelity.

METHODS:

All RC in England meeting criteria on recovery orientation, coproduction and adult learning were included. Managers completed a survey capturing characteristics, fidelity and budget. Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to identify common groupings and generate an RC typology.

RESULTS:

Participants comprised 63 (72%) of 88 RC in England. Fidelity scores were high (median 11, IQR 9-13). Both NHS and strengths-focussed RCs were associated with higher fidelity. The median annual budget was £200,000 (IQR £127,000-£300,000) per RC. The median cost per student was £518 (IQR £275-£840), cost per course designed was £5,556 (IQR £3,000-£9,416) and per course run was £1,510 (IQR £682-£3,030). The total annual budget across England for RCs is an estimated £17.6 m including £13.4 m from NHS budgets, with 11,000 courses delivered to 45,500 students.

CONCLUSION:

Although the majority of RCs had high levels of fidelity, there were sufficiently pronounced differences in other key characteristics to generate a typology of RCs. This typology might prove important for understanding student outcomes and how they are achieved and for commissioning decisions. Staffing and co-producing new courses are key drivers of spending. The estimated budget for RCs was less than 1% of NHS mental health spending.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido