Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
'Is Insulin Right for Me?': Web-based intervention to reduce psychological barriers to insulin therapy among adults with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes-A randomised controlled trial.
Holmes-Truscott, Elizabeth; Holloway, Edith E; Lam, Benjamin; Baptista, Shaira; Furler, John; Hagger, Virginia; Skinner, Timothy; Speight, Jane.
Afiliación
  • Holmes-Truscott E; School of Psychology, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Holloway EE; The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lam B; School of Psychology, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Baptista S; The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Furler J; School of Psychology, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hagger V; The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Skinner T; Education Futures, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Speight J; School of Psychology, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Diabet Med ; 40(7): e15117, 2023 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37052584
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To test 'Is Insulin Right for Me?', a theory-informed, self-directed, web-based intervention designed to reduce psychological barriers to insulin therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes. Further, to examine resource engagement and associations between minimum engagement and outcomes.

METHODS:

Double-blind, two-arm randomised controlled trial (11), comparing the intervention with freely available online information (control). Eligible participants were Australian adults with type 2 diabetes, taking oral diabetes medications, recruited primarily via national diabetes registry. EXCLUSION CRITERIA prior use of injectable medicines; being 'very willing' to commence insulin. Data collections were completed online at baseline, 2-week and 6-month follow-up. PRIMARY

OUTCOME:

negative insulin treatment appraisal scale (ITAS) scores; secondary

outcomes:

positive ITAS scores and hypothetical willingness to start insulin. ANALYSES intention-to-treat (ITT); per-protocol (PP) examination of outcomes by engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12621000191897.

RESULTS:

No significant ITT between-arm (intervention n = 233; control n = 243) differences were observed in primary (2 weeks Mdiff [95% CI] -1.0 [-2.9 to 0.9]; 6 months -0.01 [-1.9 to 1.9]), or secondary outcomes at either follow-up. There was evidence of lower Negative ITAS scores at 2-week, but not 6-month, follow-up among those with minimum intervention engagement (achieved by 44%) compared to no engagement (-2.7 [-5.1 to -0.3]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to existing information, 'Is insulin right for me?' did not improve outcomes at either timepoint. Small intervention engagement effects suggest it has potential. Further research is warranted to examine whether effectiveness would be greater in a clinical setting, following timely referral among those for whom insulin is clinically indicated.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Intervención basada en la Internet Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Diabet Med Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Intervención basada en la Internet Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Diabet Med Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia