Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative assessment of burst suppression as a predictor of seizure recurrence in refractory status epilepticus.
Fong, Michael W K; Pu, Kelly; Jadav, Rakesh; Khan, Tasleema; Hirsch, Lawrence J; Zaveri, Hitten P.
Afiliación
  • Fong MWK; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Westmead Comprehensive Epilepsy Unit, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Michael.Fong@yale.edu.
  • Pu K; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Jadav R; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neurology, Manipal Hospitals, Bengaluru, India.
  • Khan T; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Hirsch LJ; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Zaveri HP; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 150: 98-105, 2023 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37060844
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether quantitative EEG analysis of burst suppression can predict seizure recurrence in patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE) being treated with anesthetic doses of continuous IV antiseizure medications (cIVASM).

METHODS:

Quantitative assessment of burst suppression (including epileptiform discharges [EDs] and evolution) in 31 occasions (from 27 patients), and correlation with seizure recurrence up to 48 hours post sedative wean.

RESULTS:

Occasions resulting in seizure recurrence (vs. no seizure recurrence) had lower burst (8.4 vs. 10.6 µV) and interburst interval (IBI) (4.2 vs. 4.8 µV) average amplitude, duration (bursts 2.8 vs. 3.6 s IBIs 3.6 vs. 4.4 s); and burst total power (0.4 vs. 0.7 µV2). Bursts (0.86 vs. 0.60) and IBIs (0.28 vs. 0.07) with EDs, higher number of EDs within bursts (mean 2.1 vs. 1.4) and IBIs (0.6 vs. 0.2), and positive evolution measures all predicted seizure recurrence, although EDs had the greatest adjusted odds ratio on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

For patients in burst suppression, successful wean of cIVASM was not determined by classical burst suppression measures, but instead how "epileptiform" bursts and IBIs were, as determined by EDs in both bursts and IBIs and surrogates for evolution within bursts.

SIGNIFICANCE:

If confirmed, these objective measures could be used during clinical care to help determine when to wean cIVASM in patients with RSE.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estado Epiléptico / Electroencefalografía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Neurophysiol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estado Epiléptico / Electroencefalografía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Neurophysiol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article