Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of prenatal cfDNA screening for sex chromosomes.
Martin, Kimberly; Dar, Pe'er; MacPherson, Cora; Egbert, Melissa; Demko, Zachary; Parmar, Sheetal; Hashimoto, Katelyn; Haeri, Sina; Malone, Fergal; Wapner, Ronald J; Roman, Ashley S; Khalil, Asma; Faro, Revital; Madankumar, Rajeevi; Strong, Noel; Silver, Robert M; Vohra, Nidhi; Hyett, Jon; Rabinowitz, Matt; Kao, Charlly; Hakonarson, Hakon; Jacobsson, Bo; Norton, Mary E.
Afiliación
  • Martin K; Natera Inc., Austin, TX.
  • Dar P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
  • MacPherson C; The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
  • Egbert M; Natera Inc., Austin, TX.
  • Demko Z; Natera Inc., Austin, TX.
  • Parmar S; Natera Inc., Austin, TX.
  • Hashimoto K; Natera Inc., Austin, TX.
  • Haeri S; Ouma Health, Park City, UT.
  • Malone F; Rotunda Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Wapner RJ; Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, NY.
  • Roman AS; New York University Langone, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, NY.
  • Khalil A; St. George's Hospital, University of London, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, London, United Kingdom.
  • Faro R; St. Peter's University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New Brunswick, NJ.
  • Madankumar R; Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New Hyde Park, NY.
  • Strong N; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, NY.
  • Silver RM; University of Utah, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Vohra N; North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manhasset, NY.
  • Hyett J; Western Sydney University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
  • Rabinowitz M; Natera Inc., Austin, TX.
  • Kao C; Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Hakonarson H; Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Jacobsson B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Norton ME; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: nortonm@obgyn.ucsf.edu.
Genet Med ; 25(8): 100879, 2023 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37154148
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening to detect sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in an unselected obstetrical population with genetic confirmation.

METHODS:

This was a planned secondary analysis of the multicenter, prospective SNP-based Microdeletion and Aneuploidy RegisTry (SMART) study. Patients receiving cfDNA results for autosomal aneuploidies and who had confirmatory genetic results for the relevant sex chromosomal aneuploidies were included. Screening performance for SCAs, including monosomy X (MX) and the sex chromosome trisomies (SCT 47,XXX; 47,XXY; 47,XYY) was determined. Fetal sex concordance between cfDNA and genetic screening was also evaluated in euploid pregnancies.

RESULTS:

A total of 17,538 cases met inclusion criteria. Performance of cfDNA for MX, SCTs, and fetal sex was determined in 17,297, 10,333, and 14,486 pregnancies, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of cfDNA were 83.3%, 99.9%, and 22.7% for MX and 70.4%, 99.9%, and 82.6%, respectively, for the combined SCTs. The accuracy of fetal sex prediction by cfDNA was 100%.

CONCLUSION:

Screening performance of cfDNA for SCAs is comparable to that reported in other studies. The PPV for the SCTs was similar to the autosomal trisomies, whereas the PPV for MX was substantially lower. No discordance in fetal sex was observed between cfDNA and postnatal genetic screening in euploid pregnancies. These data will assist interpretation and counseling for cfDNA results for sex chromosomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Turner / Trastornos de los Cromosomas / Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células / Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Genet Med Asunto de la revista: GENETICA MEDICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Turner / Trastornos de los Cromosomas / Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células / Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Genet Med Asunto de la revista: GENETICA MEDICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article