Implementation of Lateral Flow Assays for the Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in European Hospitals: A Survey from Belgium and a Literature Review of Test Performances in Different Patient Populations.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is based on a combination of criteria, of which the detection of Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) often is decisive. To date, the most commonly used method to determine GM is an enzyme-linked immune assay (EIA). But since a few years lateral flow assays (LFAs) were introduced, providing the possibility for rapid single sample testing. More and more LFAs are entering the market, but, although often being equated, all use their own antibodies, procedures and interpretation criteria. A recent European survey revealed that about 24-33% of laboratories implemented a lateral flow assay on-site. METHODS: We conducted a survey at 81 Belgian hospital laboratories regarding the implementation of LFAs in their centre. In addition, we performed an extensive review of all publicly available studies on the performance of lateral flow assays to diagnose invasive aspergillosis. RESULTS: Response rate to the survey was 69%. Of the 56 responding hospital laboratories, 6 (11%) used an LFA. The Soña Aspergillus galactomannan LFA (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma, USA) was used in 4/6 centres, while two centres used the QuicGM (Dynamiker, Tianjin, China) and one centre used the FungiXpert Aspergillus Galactomannan Detection K-set LFA (Genobio [Era Biology Technology], Tianjin, China). One centre used 2 distinct LFAs. In 3/6 centres, the sample is sent to another lab for confirmation with GM-EIA when the LFA result is positive and in 2/6 when the LFA results is negative. In one centre, a confirmatory GM-EIA is always performed in house. In three centres the LFA result is used as a complete substitute for GM-EIA. Available LFA performance studies are very diverse and results vary in function of the study population and type of LFA. Apart from the IMMY and OLM LFA, only very limited performance data are available. From two out of three LFAs used in Belgium, no clinical performance studies are published in literature. CONCLUSIONS: A large variety of LFAs are used in Belgian Hospitals, some of which no clinical validation studies are published. These results do likely have implications for other parts of Europe and for the rest of the world as well. Due to the variable performance of LFA tests and the limited validation data available, each laboratory must check the available performance information of the specific test considered for implementation. In addition, laboratories should perform an implementation verification study.