Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Palonosetron as prophylaxis for post-discharge nausea and vomiting: a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in ambulatory surgery.
Moraitis, Antonio; Myrberg, Tomi; Hultin, Magnus; Nyström, Helena; Walldén, Jakob.
Afiliación
  • Moraitis A; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Sundsvall), Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Electronic address: antonio.moraitis@umu.se.
  • Myrberg T; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Sunderbyn), Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Hultin M; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Umeå), Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Nyström H; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Umeå), Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Walldén J; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Sundsvall), Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Br J Anaesth ; 131(2): 276-283, 2023 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37246062
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Approximately 25% of ambulatory surgery patients experience post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV). We aimed to investigate whether palonosetron, a long-acting anti-emetic, decreases the incidence of PDNV in high-risk patients.

METHODS:

In this prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 170 male and female patients undergoing ambulatory surgery under general anaesthesia, with a high predicted risk for PDNV, were randomised to receive either palonosetron 75 µg i.v. (n=84) or normal saline (n=86) before discharge. During the first 3 postoperative days (PODs), we measured outcomes using a patient questionnaire. The primary outcome was the incidence of a complete response (no nausea, vomiting, or use of rescue medication) until POD 2. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PDNV each day until POD 3.

RESULTS:

The incidence of a complete response until POD 2 was 48% (n=32) in the palonosetron group and 36% (n=25) in the placebo group (odds ratio 1.69 [95% confidence interval 0.85-3.37]; P=0.131). No significant difference in the incidence of PDNV was observed between the two groups on the day of surgery (47% vs 56%; P=0.31). Significant differences in the incidence of PDNV were found on POD 1 (18% vs 34%; P=0.033) and POD 2 (9% vs 27%; P=0.007). No differences were observed on POD 3 (15% vs 13%; P=0.700).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with placebo, palonosetron did not reduce the overall incidence of post-discharge nausea and vomiting up to postoperative day 2. The lower incidence of post-discharge nausea and vomiting on poatoperative days 1 and 2 in the palonosetron group requires further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT 2015-003956-32.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios / Antieméticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios / Antieméticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article