Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized controlled trial investigating rectus sheath catheters following radical cystectomy.
Chedgy, Edmund C P; Tang, Raymond; Struss, Werner J; Lowe, Genevieve; Sawka, Andrew; Vaghadia, Himat; Froehlich, Kevin; Black, Peter C; Gleave, Martin E; So, Alan I.
Afiliación
  • Chedgy ECP; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Tang R; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
  • Struss WJ; Department of Anesthesia, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Lowe G; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Sawka A; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
  • Vaghadia H; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Froehlich K; Department of Anesthesia, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Black PC; Department of Anesthesia, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Gleave ME; Department of Anesthesia, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • So AI; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
BJU Int ; 132(5): 554-559, 2023 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37259473
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate whether rectus sheath catheter (RSC) insertion may be an alternative to thoracic epidural (TE). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

In a non-blinded, single-centre, non-inferiority study, patients undergoing open radical cystectomy were randomized 11 to receive either a TE or surgically placed RSC. The primary endpoint was cumulative opiate use (median oral morphine equivalent [OME]) in the first 72 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale pain scores, measures of postoperative recovery including mobility and time to regular diet, and complications.

RESULTS:

Ninety-seven patients were randomized (51 TE, 46 RSC). The median OME was 103 (77.5-132.5) mg in the TE arm and 161.75 (117.5-187.5) mg in the RSC arm. A Mann-Whitney U-test confirmed non-inferiority of RSC to TE at a threshold of 15 mg OME (P = 0.002). When comparing pain scores for the first three postoperative days, an early difference was observed that favoured the TE group during post-anaesthesia care unit stay, which was lost after postoperative day 1. Patient satisfaction with analgesia on the third postoperative day was similar in the two arms (P = 0.47). There were no statistically significant differences between arms with respect to the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

The outcomes from this prospective randomized trial demonstrated non-inferiority of RSC insertion compared to TE with respect to 72-h opiate use. Patient satisfaction with pain control on postoperative day 3 was the same for each group.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá