Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Natural pressure drainage versus negative pressure drainage following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degeneration disease: a prospective cohort study.
Jiang, Fengxian; Wu, Han; Pu, Mengyang; Shen, Yixin; Zhang, Peng; Zhong, Wentao.
Afiliación
  • Jiang F; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
  • Wu H; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
  • Pu M; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
  • Shen Y; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
  • Zhang P; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. 57994891@qq.com.
  • Zhong W; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. 438775559@qq.com.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 143(10): 6131-6138, 2023 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37266693
OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively compare the perioperative data and clinical outcomes of natural pressure drainage (NAPD) and negative pressure drainage (NEPD) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degeneration disease. METHODS: Between January 2021 and December 2021, 203 patients in our hospital who underwent single- or two-segment TLIF were assigned to the NAPD group (112 patients) or the NEPD group (91 patients) based on different postoperative drainage methods. Between the two groups, comparisons were made regarding the demographics, intraoperative and postoperative data, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: The NAPD group experienced less overall drainage and fewer postoperative drainage days (157.89 vs. 318.49 ml/249.54 vs. 589.43 ml, 2.00 vs. 2.67 days/2.04 vs. 2.74 days, P < 0.001) than the NEPD group. The NAPD group has a higher rate of overall hidden blood loss (HBL) than the NEPD group (63.98% vs. 51.90%/65.80% vs. 48.11%, P < 0.001); HBL, however, did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In two-segment surgery, the postoperative hemoglobin (HGB) levels were higher in the NAPD group (99.67 vs. 92.69 g/L, P < 0.05), but there was no difference in single-segment surgery (P > 0.05). Regardless of whether single- or two-segment surgery was performed, the NAPD group had a lower HGB level loss (18.81% vs. 21.63%/26.35% vs. 32.08%, P < 0.05). There was no discernible difference between the two groups in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for symptomatic epidural hematoma, postoperative body temperature, low back and leg pain, or incision infection (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: NAPD did not increase postoperative complications but did significantly reduce postoperative drainage volume and the risk of anemia. We show that, when compared to NEPD, NAPD may be a better option for patients following TLIF.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Dolor de la Región Lumbar Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Dolor de la Región Lumbar Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China