Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The value of detailed first-trimester ultrasound in the era of noninvasive prenatal testing.
Esteves, Kristyn M; Tugarinov, Nicol; Lechmann, Grace; Abi Habib, Paola; Cagliyan, Erkan; Goetzinger, Katherine R; Turan, Ozhan M; Turan, Sifa.
Afiliación
  • Esteves KM; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD.
  • Tugarinov N; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD.
  • Lechmann G; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD.
  • Abi Habib P; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD.
  • Cagliyan E; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD.
  • Goetzinger KR; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD.
  • Turan OM; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD.
  • Turan S; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland Medical Center - Center for Advanced Fetal Care, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: sturan@som.umaryland.edu.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 229(3): 326.e1-326.e6, 2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37271433
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2020, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended noninvasive prenatal testing be offered to all patients. However, current societal guidelines in the United States do not universally recommend a detailed first-trimester ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to determine the additional findings identified through first-trimester ultrasound that would have otherwise been missed if noninvasive prenatal testing was used alone as a first-trimester screening method. STUDY

DESIGN:

This was a retrospective cohort study involving 2158 pregnant patients and 2216 fetuses that were seen at a single medical center between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. All those included underwent both noninvasive prenatal testing and detailed first-trimester ultrasound between 11.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation. Noninvasive prenatal testing results were categorized as low risk or high risk, and first-trimester ultrasound results were categorized as normal or abnormal. Abnormal first-trimester ultrasounds were further classified as first-trimester screening markers (increased nuchal translucency, absent nasal bone, tricuspid regurgitation, and ductus venosus reverse a-wave) or structural defects (the cranium, neck, heart, thorax, abdominal wall, stomach, kidneys, bladder, spine, and extremities). Descriptive statistics were used to report our findings.

RESULTS:

Of 2216 fetuses, 65 (3.0%) had a high-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result, whereas 2151 (97.0%) had a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result. Of those with a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result, 2035 (94.6%) had a normal first-trimester ultrasound, whereas 116 (5.4%) had at least 1 abnormal finding on first-trimester ultrasound. The most common screening marker detected within the low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing group was absent nasal bone (52/2151 [2.4%]), followed by reversed a-wave of the ductus venosus (30/2151 [1.4%]). The most common structural defect in this group was cardiac abnormality (15/2151 [0.7%]). Overall, 181 fetuses were identified as having "abnormal screening" through either a high-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result (n=65) or through a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result but abnormal first-trimester ultrasound (n=116). In summary, the incorporation of first-trimester ultrasound screening identified 116 additional fetuses (5.4%) that required further follow-up and surveillance than noninvasive prenatal testing alone would have identified.

CONCLUSION:

Detailed first-trimester ultrasound identified more fetuses with a potential abnormality than noninvasive prenatal testing alone. Therefore, first-trimester ultrasound remains a valuable screening method that should be used in combination with noninvasive prenatal testing.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ultrasonografía Prenatal / Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Moldova

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ultrasonografía Prenatal / Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Moldova