Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pediatric basic course goes virtual: transition from face to face to hybrid learning in pediatric critical care.
Zanin, Anna; Caragol, Angela Aramburo; Tortorolo, Luca; Patui, Michele; Pedrini, Beatrice; Brierley, Joe; Lister, Bruce; Cogo, Paola.
Afiliación
  • Zanin A; Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, via Giustiniani 3, Padova, 35100, Italy. anna.zanin@aopd.veneto.it.
  • Caragol AA; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Tortorolo L; Terapia Intensiva Pediatrica del Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
  • Patui M; Department of Medicine DAME-Division of Pediatrics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
  • Pedrini B; Department of Medicine DAME-Division of Pediatrics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
  • Brierley J; Critical Care Units, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, UK.
  • Lister B; College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cogo P; Department of Medicine DAME-Division of Pediatrics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Ital J Pediatr ; 49(1): 67, 2023 Jun 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37287003
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To explore the impact of the transition from a traditional face-to-face course delivering essential contents in pediatric critical care to a hybrid format consisting of an online pre-course self-directed learning, an online facilitated discussion, and a face-to-face edition.

METHODS:

Attendees and faculty were surveyed after the face-to-face course and the hybrid version to evaluate the effectiveness and satisfaction of participants with the course.

RESULTS:

Fifty-seven students attended multiple formats of the Pediatric Basic Course between January 2020 and October 2021 in Udine, Italy. We compared course evaluation data from the 29 attendees of the face-to-face course with the 28 of the hybrid edition. Data collected included participant demographics, participant self-assessed pre and post-course ''confidence'' with a range of pediatric intensive care-related activities, and their satisfaction with elements of the course. There were no statistical differences in participant demographics or pre and post-course confidence scores. Overall satisfaction with the face-to-face course was marginally higher, 4.59 vs. 4.25/5, but did not reach significance. Pre-recorded lectures which could be viewed several times, were highlighted as a positive for the hybrid course. Residents found no significant differences comparing the two courses in rating the lectures and the technical skills stations. Hybrid course facilities (online platform and uploaded material) were reported to be clear, accessible, and valuable by 87% of attendees. After six months, they still find the course relevant to their clinical practice (75%). Candidates considered the respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation modules the most relevant modules.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Pediatric Basic Course helps residents strengthen their learning and identify areas to improve their knowledge. Both face-to-face and hybrid model versions of the course improved attendees' knowledge and perceived confidence in managing the critically ill child.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación a Distancia / Aprendizaje Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ital J Pediatr Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación a Distancia / Aprendizaje Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ital J Pediatr Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia