Coiling embolization strategy for medium-to-giant-sized intracranial aneurysms treated with pipeline embolization device: a propensity score-weighted study.
Eur Radiol
; 33(11): 7967-7977, 2023 Nov.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37314476
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
We aim to investigate associations between different coil strategies and outcomes in the aneurysms treated by a pipeline embolization device (PED).METHODS:
Patients with medium-to-giant-sized aneurysms treated by PED were included. The total cohort was divided into PED-alone and PED-coiling groups, and the PED-coiling group was further divided into loose and dense packing subgroups. Multivariate logistic analyses and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) were performed to investigate the relationships between coiling strategies and outcomes. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were used to describe the coiling degree and angiographic outcome relationship.RESULTS:
A total of 398 patients with 410 aneurysms were included. Aneurysms treated with PED coiling had a lower incomplete occlusion rate (15.3% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.002), higher total perioperative complication rate (14.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.001), longer production time (142.14 min vs. 101.26 min, p < 0.001), and higher total cost ($45,158.63 vs. $34,680.91, p < 0.001) than those treated with PED alone. There were no differences in outcomes between the loose and dense packing subgroups. However, the total cost was higher in the dense packing group ($43,787.46 vs. $47,288.32, p = 0.001) than in the loose packing group. The result was still robust in the multivariate and sIPTW analyses. The RCS curves showed "L-shape" relationships between the coil degree and angiographic outcomes.CONCLUSION:
Compared with PED alone, PED coiling could improve aneurysm occlusion. However, it could also increase the total complication risk, prolong procedure time, and increase the total cost. Compared with loose packing, dense packing did not enhance the treatment effectiveness but increased the treatment cost. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The additional treatment effect from coiling embolization declines sharply after a certain point. Specifically, the aneurysm occlusion rate is roughly stable when the coil number is greater than 3 or the total coil length is longer than 150 cm. KEY POINTS ⢠Compared with pipeline embolization device (PED) alone, PED combined with coiling can improve aneurysm occlusion. ⢠Compared with PED alone, PED combined with coiling increases the total complication risk, cost, and prolongs procedure time. ⢠Compared with loose packing, dense packing did not increase the treatment effectiveness but increased the cost.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Aneurisma Intracraneal
/
Embolización Terapéutica
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Eur Radiol
Asunto de la revista:
RADIOLOGIA
Año:
2023
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
China