Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality, Understandability and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Skin Cancer Screening.
Reinhardt, Lydia; Steeb, Theresa; Mifka, Anika; Berking, Carola; Meier, Friedegund.
Afiliación
  • Reinhardt L; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany. lydia.reinhardt@ukdd.de.
  • Steeb T; Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany. lydia.reinhardt@ukdd.de.
  • Mifka A; Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Berking C; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen - European Metropolitan Region of Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Meier F; Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
J Cancer Educ ; 38(5): 1667-1674, 2023 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37316753
ABSTRACT
In 2008, a nationwide skin cancer screening (SCS) program was implemented in Germany. However, participation rates remain low. YouTube videos on SCS might educate eligible persons to undergo SCS. Until now, no scientific evaluation of the quality of videos available for German-speaking persons eligible for SCS has been performed. Here, we identified and evaluated videos on SCS provided on YouTube. YouTube was searched in May 2022 for German terms related to SCS. Two authors evaluated the videos of the first three pages that met the predefined eligibility criteria. The quality of the videos´ information was evaluated using DISCERN and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). The understandability and actionability were assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). The reliability was assessed with the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score. Subgroup differences were identified by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Overall, 38 videos were included in the evaluation. Most videos were provided by health professionals (clinics and practices). The average scores (mean (SD)) for the individual tools were as follows DISCERN 3.1/5 points (± 0.52), GQS 3.72/5 points (± 0.7), understandability 64,27% (± 13.53%), actionability 58.22% (± 15.18%), JAMA 37.17% (± 18.94%). These results indicate a mediocre to good understandability, a mediocre quality and actionability, and a low reliability. Videos that were assessed as useful were of significantly better quality. An improvement of freely available informational videos on SCS, especially with regard to the reliability criteria, is urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medios de Comunicación Sociales / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medios de Comunicación Sociales / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania