Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reclaiming the management of common duct stones in acute care surgery.
Bosley, Maggie E; Ganapathy, Aravindh S; Sanin, Gloria D; Cambronero, Gabriel E; Neff, Lucas P; Syriani, Fadi A; Gaffley, Michaela W; Evangelista, Meagan E; Westcott, Carl J; Miller, Preston R; Nunn, Andrew M.
Afiliación
  • Bosley ME; From the Department of General Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 95(4): 524-528, 2023 10 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405788
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Acute care surgery (ACS) is well positioned to manage choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but barriers to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) include experience and the perceived need for specialized equipment. The technical complexity of this pathway is generally seen as challenging. As such, LCBDE is historically relegated to the "enthusiast." However, a simplified, effective LCBDE technique as part of a "surgery first" strategy could drive wider adoption in the specialty most often managing these patients. To determine efficacy and safety, we sought to compare our initial ACS-driven experience with a simple, fluoroscopy-guided, catheter-based LCBDE approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to LC with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS:

We reviewed ACS patients who underwent LCBDE or LC + ERCP (pre-/postoperative) at a tertiary care center in the 4 years since starting this surgery first approach. Demographics, outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) were compared on an intention to treat basis. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed via using wire/catheter Seldinger techniques under fluoroscopic guidance with flushing or balloon dilation of the sphincter as needed. Our primary outcomes were LOS and successful duct clearance.

RESULTS:

One hundred eighty patients were treated for choledocholithiasis with 71 undergoing LCBDE. The success rate of catheter-based LCBDE was 70.4%. Length of stay was significantly reduced for the LCBDE group compared with the LC + ERCP group (48.8 vs. 84.3 hours, p < 0.01). Of note, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in the LCBDE group.

CONCLUSION:

A simplified catheter-based approach to LCBDE is safe and associated with decreased LOS when compared with LC + ERCP. This simplified step-up approach may help facilitate wider LCBDE utilization by ACS providers who are well positioned for a timely surgery first approach in the management of uncomplicated choledocholithiasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Biliares / Colecistectomía Laparoscópica / Coledocolitiasis Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Biliares / Colecistectomía Laparoscópica / Coledocolitiasis Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article