Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing treatment adherence is crucial to determine adequacy of mineralocorticoid therapy.
Pofi, Riccardo; Bonaventura, Ilaria; Duffy, Joanne; Maunsell, Zoe; Shine, Brian; Isidori, Andrea M; Tomlinson, Jeremy W.
Afiliación
  • Pofi R; Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Bonaventura I; Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
  • Duffy J; Department of Clinical Chemistry and Immunology, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Maunsell Z; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Shine B; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Isidori AM; Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
  • Tomlinson JW; Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Endocr Connect ; 12(9)2023 Aug 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37410094
Background: There is no consensus strategy for mineralocorticoid (MC) therapy titration in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI). We aim to measure serum fludrocortisone (sFC) and urine fludrocortisone (uFC) levels and to determine their utility, alongside clinical/biochemical variables and treatment adherence to guide MC replacement dose titration. Methods: Multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional study on 41 patients with PAI on MC replacement therapy. sFC and uFC levels (measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), plasma renin concentration (PRC), electrolytes (Na+, K+), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), total daily glucocorticoid (dGC) and MC (dMC) dose, and assessment of treatment adherence were incorporated into statistical models. Results: We observed a close relationship between sFC and uFC (r = 0.434, P = 0.005) and between sFC and the time from the last fludrocortisone dose (r = -0.355, P = 0.023). Total dMC dose was related to dGC dose (r = 0.556, P < 0.001), K+ (r = -0.388, P = 0.013) as well as sFC (r = 0.356, P = 0.022) and uFC (r = 0.531, P < 0.001). PRC was related to Na+ (r = 0.517, P < 0.001) and MAP (r = -0.427, P = 0.006), but not to MC dose, sFC or uFC. Regression analyses did not support a role for sFC, uFC or PRC measurements and confirmed K+ (B = -44.593, P = 0.005) as the most important variable to guide dMC titration. Of the patients, 32% were non-adherent with replacement therapy. When adherence was inserted into the regression model, it was the only factor affecting dMC. Conclusions: sFC and uFC levels are not helpful in guiding dMC titration. Treatment adherence impacts on clinical variables used to assess MC replacement and should be included as part of routine care in patients with PAI.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Endocr Connect Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Endocr Connect Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article