Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
To Use or Not to Use? Quantifying the Benefit of Microcatheter Use in Adrenal Vein Sampling.
Liu, Lisa; Casadaban, Leigh; Jensen, Alexandria; Ho, Bethany; Neves da Silva, Helio; Selph, Chad; Hughes, Michael; Trivedi, Premal.
Afiliación
  • Liu L; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: lisa.liu@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Casadaban L; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Jensen A; Quantitative Science Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Ho B; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Neves da Silva H; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Selph C; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Hughes M; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Trivedi P; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: premal.trivedi@cuanschutz.edu.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 34(12): 2203-2207, 2023 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460060
ABSTRACT
Adrenal vein sampling is a technically difficult procedure with reported sampling success rates as low as 41%. Routine microcatheter use has been suggested by some to improve sampling adequacy. This study is a single-institution retrospective review of adrenal vein sampling procedures performed from 2014 to 2021 to quantify sample selectivity and adequacy with and without the use of a microcatheter. Microcatheter sampling was performed in 43 (47%) of 92 cases on the right adrenal gland and 44 (48%) of 92 cases on the left adrenal gland. Mean selectivity index was significantly higher bilaterally with microcatheters (right, 36.8 vs 27.7; P = .05; left, 33.9 vs 19.9 left; P < .001). However, sampling adequacy rates did not significantly differ between microcatheter and 5-F sampling bilaterally (right, 91% vs 90%; P = .88; left, 96% vs 98%; P = .51). Adrenal hemorrhage occurred exclusively with right-sided microcatheter sampling (n = 6, 13%). In conclusion, although microcatheter sampling increases mean selectivity index, it does not change sampling adequacy rate and may increase the risk of right adrenal hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperaldosteronismo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperaldosteronismo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article