Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ten rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 widely differ in their ability to detect Omicron-BA.4 and -BA.5.
Krenn, Franziska; Dächert, Christopher; Badell, Irina; Lupoli, Gaia; Öztan, Gamze Naz; Feng, Tianle; Schneider, Nikolas; Huber, Melanie; Both, Hanna; Späth, Patricia M; Muenchhoff, Maximilian; Graf, Alexander; Krebs, Stefan; Blum, Helmut; Durner, Jürgen; Czibere, Ludwig; Kaderali, Lars; Keppler, Oliver T; Baldauf, Hanna-Mari; Osterman, Andreas.
Afiliación
  • Krenn F; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Dächert C; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Badell I; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Munich, Germany.
  • Lupoli G; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Öztan GN; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Feng T; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Schneider N; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Huber M; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Both H; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Späth PM; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Muenchhoff M; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Graf A; Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Krebs S; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Munich, Germany.
  • Blum H; COVID-19 Registry of the LMU Munich (CORKUM), University Hospital, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Durner J; Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, Gene Center, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Czibere L; Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, Gene Center, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Kaderali L; Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, Gene Center, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Keppler OT; Labor Becker MVZ GbR, Munich, Germany.
  • Baldauf HM; Labor Becker MVZ GbR, Munich, Germany.
  • Osterman A; Institute of Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Med Microbiol Immunol ; 212(5): 323-337, 2023 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37561225
ABSTRACT
Since late 2021, the variant landscape of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been dominated by the variant of concern (VoC) Omicron and its sublineages. We and others have shown that the detection of Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2-positive respiratory specimens by rapid antigen tests (RATs) is impaired compared to Delta VoC-containing samples. Here, in a single-center retrospective laboratory study, we evaluated the performance of ten most commonly used RATs for the detection of Omicron-BA.4 and -BA.5 infections. We used 171 respiratory swab specimens from SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive patients, of which 71 were classified as BA.4 and 100 as BA.5. All swabs were collected between July and September 2022. 50 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative samples from healthy individuals, collected in October 2022, showed high specificity in 9 out of 10 RATs. When assessing analytical sensitivity using clinical specimens, the 50% limit of detection (LoD50) ranged from 7.6 × 104 to 3.3 × 106 RNA copies subjected to the RATs for BA.4 compared to 6.8 × 104 to 3.0 × 106 for BA.5. Overall, intra-assay differences for the detection of these two Omicron subvariants were not significant for both respiratory swabs and tissue culture-expanded virus isolates. In contrast, marked heterogeneity was observed among the ten RATs to be positive in these point-of-care tests, up to 443-fold (BA.4) and up to 56-fold (BA.5) higher viral loads were required for the worst performing RAT compared to the best performing RAT. True-positive rates for Omicron-BA.4- or -BA.5-containing specimens in the highest viral load category (Ct values < 25) ranged from 94.3 to 34.3%, dropping to 25.6 to 0% for samples with intermediate Ct values (25-30). We conclude that the high heterogeneity in the performance of commonly used RATs remains a challenge for the general public to obtain reliable results in the evolving Omicron subvariant-driven pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Microbiol Immunol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Microbiol Immunol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania