Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disparities in Eye Care Utilization by Self-Reported Vision Difficulty and Diabetes Status in the United States.
Brinson, Jessica; Kumar, Priyanka; Wang, Jiangxia; Varadaraj, Varshini; Swenor, Bonnielin K; Scott, Adrienne W.
Afiliación
  • Brinson J; Department of Ophthalmology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Kumar P; Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Wang J; Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Varadaraj V; Johns Hopkins Disability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Swenor BK; Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Scott AW; Johns Hopkins Disability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; : 1-8, 2023 Aug 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37614029
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess differences in eye care utilization by vision difficulty (VD), diabetes status, and sociodemographic characteristics for American adults.

METHODS:

The analysis pooled cross-sectional data from the National Health Interview Survey (2010-2018) from US adults ≥ 18 years. The outcome measure was eye care utilization in the past year. The primary independent variable included four groups no VD or diabetes, only diabetes, only VD, and diabetes and VD. VD was defined as self-reported difficulty seeing even with glasses or contacts. Diabetic status was defined as ever receiving this diagnosis by a health professional. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between eye care utilization, VD, diabetic status, and sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS:

Of the 284,599 adults included in this study, the majority were female (55%), White (73%), and non-Hispanic (84%). In regression analysis, as compared to adults without diabetes or VD, adults with both diabetes and VD had the greatest utilization (OR = 2.49, 99% CI = 2.18-2.85). Females had higher utilization than men (OR = 1.45, 99% CI = 1.41-1.50). Higher levels of education was associated with greater utilization (OR = 1.82, 99% CI = 1.72-1.92). White and American Indian adults without diabetes had higher utilization compared to other races (OR = 1.17, 99% CI = 1.12-1.24, 0.98-1.39).

CONCLUSION:

While adults with VD and diabetes are better connected to eye care, significant eye care disparities persist for marginalized groups in the U.S. Identifying and understanding these disparities and eliminating barriers to care is critical to better support all patient populations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos