Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Elucidating osseointegration in vivo in 3D printed scaffolds eliciting different foreign body responses.
Qiu, Dewei; Cao, Chuanliang; Prasopthum, Aruna; Sun, Zhenchang; Zhang, Shan; Yang, Hanwen; Xu, Zhiyong; Tao, Jun; Ai, Fanrong; Yang, Jing.
Afiliación
  • Qiu D; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
  • Cao C; School of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
  • Prasopthum A; School of Pharmacy, Walailak University, Thailand.
  • Sun Z; Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
  • Zhang S; School of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
  • Yang H; School of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
  • Xu Z; School of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
  • Tao J; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
  • Ai F; School of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
  • Yang J; School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, UK.
Mater Today Bio ; 22: 100771, 2023 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37674779
ABSTRACT
Osseointegration between biomaterial and bone is critical for the clinical success of many orthopaedic and dental implants. However, the mechanisms of in vivo interfacial bonding formation and the role of immune cells in this process remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the bone-scaffold material interfaces in two different 3D printed porous scaffolds (polymer/hydroxyapatite and sintered hydroxyapatite) that elicited different levels of foreign body response (FBR). The polymer/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds elicited more intensive FBR, which was evidenced by more FBR components, such as macrophages/foreign body giant cells and fibrous tissue, surrounding the material surface. Sintered hydroxyapatite scaffolds showed less intensive FBR compared to the composite scaffolds. The interfacial bonding appeared to form via new bone first forming within the pores of the scaffolds followed by growing towards strut surfaces. In contrast, it was previously thought that bone regeneration starts at biomaterial surfaces via osteogenic stem/progenitor cells first attaching to them. The material-bone interface of the less immunogenic hydroxyapatite scaffolds was heterogenous across all samples, evidenced by the coexistence of osseointegration and FBR components. The presence of FBR components appeared to inhibit osseointegration. Where FBR components were present there was no osseointegration. Our results offer new insight on the in vivo formation of bone-material interface, which highlights the importance of minimizing FBR to facilitate osseointegration for the development of better orthopaedic and dental biomaterials.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Mater Today Bio Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Mater Today Bio Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China