Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Vivo Fluticasone Absorption in Surgical Patients.
Lee, Saangyoung E; Ritter, Elizabeth; Nguyen, Tuong T; Onuorah, Princess C; Ebert, Charles S; Senior, Brent A; Thorp, Brian D; Kimple, Adam J.
Afiliación
  • Lee SE; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Ritter E; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Nguyen TT; Marsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Onuorah PC; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Ebert CS; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Senior BA; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Thorp BD; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Kimple AJ; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Laryngoscope ; 134(4): 1551-1555, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37694807
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) are a treatment mainstay of chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic rhinitis. Current computational models demonstrate that >90% of INCS drug deposition occurs on the head of the inferior turbinate and nasal valve, rather than the actual sinuses. These models do not consider mucociliary clearance which propels mucus posteriorly, nor do they consider the absorption of the drug. The purpose of this study is to better understand the exact anatomical location where INCS are absorbed.

METHODS:

Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic rhinitis taking fluticasone pre-operatively who were scheduled for functional endoscopic sinus surgery and inferior turbinate reduction, respectively, were recruited. Intra-operative tissue samples were obtained from predetermined locations within the sinonasal cavity. Mass spectrometry was then used to quantify the amount of absorption in each specific anatomic location to determine the largest amount of absorption.

RESULTS:

Eighteen patients were included in our study. The greatest fluticasone absorption levels across the sinonasal anatomy were at the anterior inferior turbinate (5.7 ngl/mL), ethmoid sinus, (4.4 ng/mL), posterior inferior turbinate (3.7 ng/mL), maxillary sinus (1.3 ng/mL), and the sphenoethmoidal recess (0.72 ng/mL) respectively. Absorption was significantly higher in revision surgery compared to surgically naïve patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Computation fluid dynamic models of the nasal passage are useful models to help predict intranasal particle flow. However, these models do not incorporate or consider the important mucociliary clearance system, leading to absorption of fluticasone throughout the sinonasal cavity far beyond that predicted by these models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 1341551-1555, 2024.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sinusitis / Rinitis / Rinitis Alérgica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sinusitis / Rinitis / Rinitis Alérgica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos