The role of a multidisciplinary team in managing variants of uncertain clinical significance in prenatal genetic diagnosis.
Eur J Med Genet
; 66(10): 104844, 2023 Oct.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37709011
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Although in general prenatal exome sequencing only reports (likely) pathogenic variants, in some cases a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) is disclosed. The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the types of VUS that have been reported to prospective parents, possible reclassification and to design a standard flow chart to determine which types of VUS could be considered for reporting in prenatal settings. Furthermore, we investigated what the crucial elements are to facilitate rapid management of uncertain results in a prenatal setting. MATERIAL ANDMETHODS:
We reviewed exome results from 451 pregnancies performed in 2019-2021. We analyzed which factors that were taken into account by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) contributed towards decision making on reporting VUS after prenatal exome sequencing.RESULTS:
In 9/451 (2%) pregnancies tested with exome sequencing using a broad panel analysis a VUS was reported. After birth 3/9 VUS could be reclassified to likely pathogenic variants based on new clinical follow up data. We considered reporting VUS in genes 1) matching the fetal phenotype, 2) associated with a severe disorder when a functional test is available or 3) possibly associated with a disorder where early post-partum diagnosis and treatment are crucial for a better prognosis. Two flowcharts were designed to guide first the laboratory specialist and then the MDT in decisions on reporting VUS. The crucial elements that enabled timely decisions on VUS disclosure were regular meetings, appropriate expertise, professional connections with other experts and psychological safety within the MDT.CONCLUSION:
In this study three out of nine VUS could be re-classified as likely pathogenic after clinical follow-up. In order to protect pregnant couples from the burden of uncertain results, the genetic professionals have to take the responsibility to limit the reporting of VUS. This can be done not only by automated filtering of data, by following professional guidelines and by building standardized decision flows, but also by discussing individual cases considering personal situations and the involved disease and by sharing professional experience and responsibility in a multidisciplinary prenatal team setting.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Pruebas Genéticas
/
Relevancia Clínica
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Guideline
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Pregnancy
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Eur J Med Genet
Asunto de la revista:
GENETICA MEDICA
Año:
2023
Tipo del documento:
Article