Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Principles of Design of Clinical Trials for Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and Aging-Associated Cognitive Decline in the ACH2.0 Perspective: Potential Outcomes, Challenges, and Solutions.
Volloch, Vladimir; Rits-Volloch, Sophia.
Afiliación
  • Volloch V; Department of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Rits-Volloch S; Division of Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis Rep ; 7(1): 921-955, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37849639
ABSTRACT
With the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (ACH) largely discredited, the ACH2.0 theory of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been recently introduced. Within the framework of the ACH2.0, AD is triggered by amyloidprotein precursor (AßPP)-derived intraneuronal Aß (iAß) and is driven by iAß produced in the AßPP-independent pathway and retained intraneuronally. In this paradigm, the depletion of extracellular Aß or suppression of Aß production by AßPP proteolysis, the two sources of AßPP-derived iAß, would be futile in symptomatic AD, due to its reliance on iAß generated independently of AßPP, but effective in preventing AD and treating Aging-Associated Cognitive Decline (AACD) driven, in the ACH2.0 framework, by AßPP-derived iAß. The observed effect of lecanemab and donanemab, interpreted in the ACH2.0 perspective, supports this notion and mandates AD-preventive clinical trials. Such trials are currently in progress. They are likely, however, to fail or to yield deceptive results if conducted conventionally. The present study considers concepts of design of clinical trials of lecanemab, donanemab, or any other drug, targeting the influx of AßPP-derived iAß, in prevention of AD and treatment of AACD. It analyzes possible outcomes and explains why selection of high-risk asymptomatic participants seems reasonable but is not. It argues that outcomes of such AD preventive trials could be grossly misleading, discusses inevitable potential problems, and proposes feasible solutions. It advocates the initial evaluation of this type of drugs in clinical trials for treatment of AACD. Whereas AD protective trials of these drugs are potentially of an impractical length, AACD clinical trials are expected to yield unequivocal results within a relatively short duration. Moreover, success of the latter, in addition to its intrinsic value, would constitute a proof of concept for the former. Furthermore, this study introduces concepts of the active versus passive iAß depletion, contends that targeted degradation of iAß is the best therapeutic strategy for both prevention and treatment of AD and AACD, proposes potential iAß-degrading drugs, and describes their feasible and unambiguous evaluation in clinical trials.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Alzheimers Dis Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Alzheimers Dis Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos