Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-resolution maps show that rubber causes substantial deforestation.
Wang, Yunxia; Hollingsworth, Peter M; Zhai, Deli; West, Christopher D; Green, Jonathan M H; Chen, Huafang; Hurni, Kaspar; Su, Yufang; Warren-Thomas, Eleanor; Xu, Jianchu; Ahrends, Antje.
Afiliación
  • Wang Y; Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. wangyx.tina@outlook.com.
  • Hollingsworth PM; Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Zhai D; Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xishuangbanna, China.
  • West CD; Stockholm Environment Institute York, Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK.
  • Green JMH; Stockholm Environment Institute York, Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK.
  • Chen H; Centre for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
  • Hurni K; China Country Program, CIFOR-ICRAF, Kunming, China.
  • Su Y; Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Warren-Thomas E; East-West Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
  • Xu J; Institute of Economics, Yunnan Academy of Social Sciences, Kunming, China.
  • Ahrends A; China Country Program, CIFOR-ICRAF, Kunming, China.
Nature ; 623(7986): 340-346, 2023 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853124
Understanding the effects of cash crop expansion on natural forest is of fundamental importance. However, for most crops there are no remotely sensed global maps1, and global deforestation impacts are estimated using models and extrapolations. Natural rubber is an example of a principal commodity for which deforestation impacts have been highly uncertain, with estimates differing more than fivefold1-4. Here we harnessed Earth observation satellite data and cloud computing5 to produce high-resolution maps of rubber (10 m pixel size) and associated deforestation (30 m pixel size) for Southeast Asia. Our maps indicate that rubber-related forest loss has been substantially underestimated in policy, by the public and in recent reports6-8. Our direct remotely sensed observations show that deforestation for rubber is at least twofold to threefold higher than suggested by figures now widely used for setting policy4. With more than 4 million hectares of forest loss for rubber since 1993 (at least 2 million hectares since 2000) and more than 1 million hectares of rubber plantations established in Key Biodiversity Areas, the effects of rubber on biodiversity and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia could be extensive. Thus, rubber deserves more attention in domestic policy, within trade agreements and in incoming due-diligence legislation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Goma / Bosques / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Mapeo Geográfico / Imágenes Satelitales País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Nature Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Goma / Bosques / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Mapeo Geográfico / Imágenes Satelitales País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Nature Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article