Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of Inertial Measurement Units for Analyzing Golf Swing Rotational Biomechanics.
Kim, Sung Eun; Burket Koltsov, Jayme Carolynn; Richards, Alexander Wilder; Zhou, Joanne; Schadl, Kornel; Ladd, Amy L; Rose, Jessica.
Afiliación
  • Kim SE; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Burket Koltsov JC; Motion & Gait Analysis Lab, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
  • Richards AW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Zhou J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Schadl K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Ladd AL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Rose J; Motion & Gait Analysis Lab, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Sensors (Basel) ; 23(20)2023 Oct 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37896527
Training devices to enhance golf swing technique are increasingly in demand. Golf swing biomechanics are typically assessed in a laboratory setting and not readily accessible. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer improved access as they are wearable, cost-effective, and user-friendly. This study investigates the accuracy of IMU-based golf swing kinematics of upper torso and pelvic rotation compared to lab-based 3D motion capture. Thirty-six male and female professional and amateur golfers participated in the study, nine in each sub-group. Golf swing rotational kinematics, including upper torso and pelvic rotation, pelvic rotational velocity, S-factor (shoulder obliquity), O-factor (pelvic obliquity), and X-factor were compared. Strong positive correlations between IMU and 3D motion capture were found for all parameters; Intraclass Correlations ranged from 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89, 0.93) for O-factor to 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.00) for upper torso rotation; Pearson coefficients ranged from 0.92 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.93) for O-factor to 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.00) for upper torso rotation (p < 0.001 for all). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between the two methods; absolute mean differences ranged from 0.61 to 1.67 degrees. Results suggest that IMUs provide a practical and viable alternative for golf swing analysis, offering golfers accessible and wearable biomechanical feedback to enhance performance. Furthermore, integrating IMUs into golf coaching can advance swing analysis and personalized training protocols. In conclusion, IMUs show significant promise as cost-effective and practical devices for golf swing analysis, benefiting golfers across all skill levels and providing benchmarks for training.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Golf Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Golf Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos