Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Pooled Analysis of 3 Phase II Trials of Salvage Nivolumab/Ipilimumab After Nivolumab in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
McKay, Rana R; Leucht, Katharina; Xie, Wanling; Jegede, Opeyemi; Braun, David A; Atkins, Michael B; Grimm, Marc-Oliver; Choueiri, Toni K.
Afiliación
  • McKay RR; Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Leucht K; Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Xie W; Department of Urology, Universitaetsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Jegede O; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Braun DA; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Atkins MB; Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Grimm MO; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Choueiri TK; Department of Urology, Universitaetsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Oncologist ; 29(4): 324-331, 2024 Apr 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37950901
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab has demonstrated improved survival for treatment-naïve advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A series of clinical trials evaluated the effect of salvage nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients without an objective response to nivolumab. Given the size and heterogeneity of these studies, we performed a pooled analysis to better inform the activity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab after nivolumab. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Eligible patients included those with advanced clear cell RCC having received no prior immunotherapy. The primary objective was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator-assessment. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

The analysis included 410 patients with clear cell RCC, of whom 340 (82.9%) had IMDC intermediate/poor risk disease, and 137 (33.4%) had prior treatment. The 16-18-week ORR to nivolumab prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab was 22.7% (n = 93), and best ORR to nivolumab was 25.1% (n = 103). Two hundred and thirty (56.1%) patients treated with nivolumab received nivolumab plus ipilimumab at a median of 16 weeks (IQR 9-19) after initiation of nivolumab [27.0% (n = 62) with stable disease and 73.0% (n = 168) with progressive disease to nivolumab]. The ORR to nivolumab plus ipilimumab was 12.6% (n = 29). Six-month PFS on nivolumab plus ipilimumab was 37% (95% CI, 27-47). Median follow-up was 34.3 months and 3-year OS was 59% (95% CI, 53-64) from nivolumab start.

CONCLUSION:

A small subset of patients lacking a response to nivolumab derive benefit from salvage nivolumab plus ipilimumab. When possible, both drugs should be given in concomitantly, rather in an adaptive fashion.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos