Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Efficacy and Safety of Standard versus Soft Topical Steroids after Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Noyman, Dror Ben Ephraim; Chan, Clara C; Mimouni, Michael; Safir, Margarita.
Afiliación
  • Noyman DBE; Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
  • Chan CC; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mimouni M; Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Bruce and Ruth Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
  • Safir M; Department of Ophthalmology, Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: safir.margarita@gmail.com.
Ophthalmology ; 131(5): 595-610, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38007198
TOPIC: Review of the efficacy and safety of standard versus soft topical steroid application after cataract surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The control of postoperative inflammation is the mainstay of treatment after cataract surgery. However, no consensus exists regarding the postoperative steroid of choice. Basing the choice of topical postoperative steroidal treatment on high-quality data regarding both risks and benefits of various drugs would be advantageous for both patients and clinicians. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase electronic databases for all peer-reviewed published randomized control trials that included clinical outcomes of topical steroidal treatment after uneventful cataract surgery was performed. Individual study data were extracted and evaluated in a weighted pooled analysis including grading of total anterior chamber (AC) inflammation, AC cells, AC flare, postoperative visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and rate of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Overall, 508 studies were found, of which 7 were eligible for the systematic review and ultimately were included for analysis, reporting on 593 patients from 5 countries. Age of included patients, when available, ranged between 3.7 and 73.4 years. Follow-up data were available for analysis at 1, 7, and 28 days after surgery. Except for a significantly lower grade of AC flare in the standard steroid group at day 7 (standardized mean difference, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.47; I2 = 0%), inflammatory activity measurements displayed insignificant differences at every other follow-up (days 1 and 28 after surgery). Pooled analysis of IOP at each follow-up demonstrated a higher IOP at the 7-day visit in the standard steroid group, whereas IOP at other time points was comparable among the groups. Qualitative analysis of ocular AEs showed similarities among the groups. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study suggest that for the average patient, both groups produce a comparable effect on both AC inflammation and postoperative IOP and VA. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel