Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Utilization and Perceptions of Formal Education of Point-of-care Ultrasound in Urology.
Schlaepfer, Charles H; Packiam, Vignesh T; Tracy, Chad R; Takacs, Elizabeth B; Steinberg, Ryan L.
Afiliación
  • Schlaepfer CH; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA.
  • Packiam VT; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA.
  • Tracy CR; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA.
  • Takacs EB; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA.
  • Steinberg RL; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA. Electronic address: ryan-steinberg@uiowa.edu.
Urology ; 184: 8-14, 2024 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065312
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the extent of formal point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training, current utilization of POCUS, and contemporary perceptions of POCUS amongst urologists.

METHODS:

A survey including questions regarding demographics, prior ultrasound education, current ultrasound utilization in practice/training, perceived optimal POCUS utilization, and the perception of formal ultrasound training was developed. The survey was disseminated to residency program directors (PDs) via the SAU and members of AUA subsection organizations. Data were collected via Redcap.

RESULTS:

A total of 40 PDs and 159 other respondents completed the survey with approximately half (51%) in an academic practice and two-thirds (68%) with more than 10years in practice. PD response rate was 28%, and general response rate was 2%. Among all respondents, 95% (186/196) and 82% (160/194) agreed/strongly agreed formal POCUS training would be worthwhile during and after residency. Among urology residency PDs, 93% (37/40) agreed/strongly agreed that formal POCUS training is worthwhile in residency. The majority of respondents used some form of ultrasound in practice (77%, 154/199). However, only 37% (72/199) of all respondents had prior formal POCUS training, and 19% (5/26) of PDs reported formal training in their programs. Of respondents without formal training, 63% (80/127) reported interest in pursuing formal training.

CONCLUSION:

POCUS is widely utilized in many practices. Yet, most urologists have not participated in formal POCUS training and most programs do not have curricula. Urologists have favorable opinions of the utility, safety, and efficacy of POCUS and desire training.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Urología / Internado y Residencia Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Urología / Internado y Residencia Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article