Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the clinical utility of biomarkers using the intervention probability curve (IPC).
Paez, Rafael; Rowe, Dianna J; Deppen, Stephen A; Grogan, Eric L; Kaizer, Alexander; Bornhop, Darryl J; Kussrow, Amanda K; Barón, Anna E; Maldonado, Fabien; Kammer, Michael N.
Afiliación
  • Paez R; Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Rowe DJ; Multidisciplinary Approach to Stratification of Lung Cancer with Biomarkers, MASLAB, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Deppen SA; Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Grogan EL; Multidisciplinary Approach to Stratification of Lung Cancer with Biomarkers, MASLAB, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Kaizer A; Multidisciplinary Approach to Stratification of Lung Cancer with Biomarkers, MASLAB, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Bornhop DJ; Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Kussrow AK; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Barón AE; Multidisciplinary Approach to Stratification of Lung Cancer with Biomarkers, MASLAB, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Maldonado F; Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Kammer MN; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Cancer Biomark ; 2023 Oct 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38073376
BACKGROUND: Assessing the clinical utility of biomarkers is a critical step before clinical implementation. The reclassification of patients across clinically relevant subgroups is considered one of the best methods to estimate clinical utility. However, there are important limitations with this methodology. We recently proposed the intervention probability curve (IPC) which models the likelihood that a provider will choose an intervention as a continuous function of the probability, or risk, of disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential impact of a new biomarker for lung cancer using the IPC. METHODS: The IPC derived from the National Lung Screening Trial was used to assess the potential clinical utility of a biomarker for suspected lung cancer. The summary statistics of the change in likelihood of intervention over the population can be interpreted as the expected clinical impact of the added biomarker. RESULTS: The IPC analysis of the novel biomarker estimated that 8% of the benign nodules could avoid an invasive procedure while the cancer nodules would largely remain unchanged (0.1%). We showed the benefits of this approach compared to traditional reclassification methods based on thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: The IPC methodology can be a valuable tool for assessing biomarkers prior to clinical implementation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Biomark Asunto de la revista: BIOQUIMICA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Biomark Asunto de la revista: BIOQUIMICA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos