Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physical Activity and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Pregnancy: Does It Matter during Leisure or Work?
Liu, Xinyue; Chen, Liwei; Li, Jian; Holtermann, Andreas; Lu, Ruijin; Birukov, Anna; Weir, Natalie L; Tsai, Michael Y; Zhang, Cuilin.
Afiliación
  • Liu X; Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Chen L; Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Holtermann A; National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, DENMARK.
  • Lu R; School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
  • Birukov A; Department of Nutrition, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
  • Weir NL; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Tsai MY; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 56(1): 110-117, 2024 Jan 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098149
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Physical activity (PA), regardless of domain, is recommended for pregnant individuals in clinical guidelines, but limited evidence is available for work-related PA. This study aimed to examine the associations of occupational (OPA) and leisure-time PA (LTPA) with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), a risk marker for adverse pregnancy outcomes, among pregnant individuals.

METHODS:

This longitudinal study included 257 workers in the fetal growth cohort. OPA/LTPA and hs-CRP were measured in each trimester. OPA/LTPA was divided into high and low groups by the median level. Multivariable linear regressions were applied to estimate the adjusted geometric mean differences of hs-CRP (mg·L-1) comparing high versus low OPA/LTPA in each trimester and the changes in OPA/LTPA over pregnancy.

RESULTS:

OPA was positively associated with hs-CRP (high 5.14 vs low 3.59; P value 0.001) in the first trimester, particularly for standing/walking or walking fast, regardless of carrying things. LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP in the second (high 3.93 vs low 5.08; 0.02) and third trimesters (high 3.30 vs low 4.40; 0.046). Compared with the low OPA + high LTPA group, hs-CRP was higher in both the high OPA + high LTPA and high OPA + low LTPA groups in the first trimester, and in the high OPA + low LTPA group only in the third trimester. The change in OPA during pregnancy was positively associated with hs-CRP, whereas the change in LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP from the second to the third trimester.

CONCLUSIONS:

In pregnant individuals, LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP, whereas OPA was positively associated with hs-CRP. More research on OPA's health impact among pregnant individuals is needed, and guidelines may consider the potential unfavorable influence of OPA on pregnant individuals.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteína C-Reactiva / Ejercicio Físico Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Sports Exerc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteína C-Reactiva / Ejercicio Físico Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Sports Exerc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá