Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Telitacicept in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Wu, Di; Li, Jing; Xu, Dong; Merrill, Joan T; van Vollenhoven, Ronald F; Liu, Yi; Hu, Jiankang; Li, Yang; Li, Fen; Huang, Chenghui; Wang, Guochun; Li, Xiaomei; Zhao, Jianhong; Zhao, Dongbao; Huang, Cibo; Liu, Huaxiang; Wei, Wei; Shi, Guixiu; Lu, Fuai; Zuo, Xiaoxia; Bi, Liqi; Li, Zhijun; Wang, Xiaoxia; Zhang, Miaojia; Tie, Ning; Li, Juan; Mo, Hanyou; Fang, Jianmin; Bao, Chunde; Zhang, Fengchun.
Afiliación
  • Wu D; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Ministry of Science & Technology; State Key L
  • Li J; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Ministry of Science & Technology; State Key L
  • Xu D; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Ministry of Science & Technology; State Key L
  • Merrill JT; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
  • van Vollenhoven RF; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Liu Y; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Hu J; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Jiangxi Pingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang, Jiangxi, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Guangdong People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li F; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Huang C; Department of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Wang G; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Li X; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  • Zhao J; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China.
  • Zhao D; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Huang C; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, South China Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Liu H; Department of Rheumatology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Wei W; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Shi G; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
  • Lu F; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China.
  • Zuo X; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Bi L; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
  • Li Z; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
  • Wang X; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  • Zhang M; Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
  • Tie N; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
  • Li J; Rheumatology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Mo H; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
  • Fang J; School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China zhangfccra@aliyun.com baochunde_1678@126.com jfang@tongji.edu.cn.
  • Bao C; RemeGen Co., Ltd, Yantai, Shandong, China.
  • Zhang F; Department of Rheumatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China zhangfccra@aliyun.com baochunde_1678@126.com jfang@tongji.edu.cn.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 83(4): 475-487, 2024 Mar 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38129117
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a novel fusion protein that neutralises signals of B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand, in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS:

Adult patients with active SLE (n=249) were recruited from 29 hospitals in China and randomised 1111 to receive subcutaneous telitacicept at 80 mg (n=62), 160 mg (n=63), 240 mg (n=62) or placebo (n=62) once weekly in addition to standard therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response at week 48. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward method.

RESULTS:

At week 48, the proportion of patients achieving an SRI-4 response was 75.8% in the 240 mg telitacicept group, 68.3% in the 160 mg group, 71.0% in the 80 mg group and 33.9% in the placebo group (all p<0.001). Significant treatment responses were observed in secondary endpoints, including a ≥4-point reduction on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, a lack of Physician's Global Assessment score worsening and a glucocorticoid dose reduction in the 240 mg group. Telitacicept was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was similar between the telitacicept and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

This phase 2b clinical trial met the primary endpoint. All telitacicept groups showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving an SRI-4 response than the placebo group at week 48, and all doses were well tolerated. These results support further investigations of telitacicept in clinical trials involving more diverse populations and larger sample sizes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02885610).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Rheum Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Rheum Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article