Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry: Radiographer'S Role in Assessing Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Questionnaire Variables.
Zanardo, Moreno; Mennini, Cinzia; Glielmo, Pierluigi; Fusco, Stefano; Albano, Domenico; Messina, Carmelo.
Afiliación
  • Zanardo M; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
  • Mennini C; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milan, Italy.
  • Glielmo P; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milan, Italy.
  • Fusco S; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Albano D; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Messina C; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: carmelo.messina@unimi.it.
J Clin Densitom ; 27(1): 101458, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141277
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The FRAX® algorithm is a tool used to calculate the 10-year probability of fracture in patients with osteoporosis and is based the assessment of several risk factors. We assessed the performance and accuracy of the completion of the FRAX® anamnestic questionnaire by the radiographer without impact on the clinical workflow.

METHODOLOGY:

We evaluated the accuracy of fracture risk calculation by the radiographer using the FRAX® algorithm before and after specific training. A total of 100 women were enrolled in the study. The radiographer preliminarily administered the FRAX® questionnaire to all subjects before the execution of the DXA examination. After the end of the examination, a radiologist administered the questionnaire to the patient. Women were divided into two groups group A (pre-training) and group B (post-training). The radiographer in group A completed the FRAX® questionnaire for the patients before training. For group B, the same radiographer completed the FRAX® questionnaire after training. The results of the FRAX® questionnaire completed by radiographer were compared with that completed by the referring physician.

RESULTS:

Before training, radiographer's accuracy ranged from 92% (question 7, alcohol consumption) to 36% (question 6, secondary osteoporosis). After training, accuracy values improved substantially, ranging from 100% to 92%. Analysis of the absolute values of FRAX® showed that in the pre-training group data tended to be overestimated by the radiographer, with both major and fractures probabilities being significantly higher when assessed by the radiographer (12% and 5.8%, respectively). After the training, there was a marked decrease in the variation between the FRAX® data calculated by the radiographer and the radiologist.

CONCLUSIONS:

The accuracy of fracture risk calculation by the radiographer using the FRAX® algorithm is significantly improved after a specific training period. This study demonstrates the importance of dedicated training radiographers on the FRAX® algorithm.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Fracturas Óseas / Fracturas Osteoporóticas Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Densitom Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Fracturas Óseas / Fracturas Osteoporóticas Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Densitom Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia