Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Differ by the Number of Antianginals for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease? Insights from the BARI 2D Trial.
Jamil, Yasser; Park, Dae Yong; Verde, Luis More; Sherwood, Matthew W; Tehrani, Behnam N; Batchelor, Wayne B; Frampton, Jennifer; Damluji, Abdulla A; Nanna, Michael G.
Afiliación
  • Jamil Y; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: yasser.jamil@yale.edu.
  • Park DY; Department of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Verde LM; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Sherwood MW; Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Tehrani BN; Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Batchelor WB; Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Frampton J; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Damluji AA; Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Falls Church, Virginia; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Nanna MG; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Am J Cardiol ; 214: 66-76, 2024 Mar 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160927
ABSTRACT
Medical therapy, including antianginal treatment, is the cornerstone in the management of stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). However, it remains unclear whether combining antianginal agents provides benefits beyond monotherapy in terms of quality of life (QoL) and cardiovascular outcomes. We used data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial, which compared cardiovascular and QoL outcomes in patients with SIHD and diabetes mellitus randomized to revascularization with intensive medical therapy or intensive medical therapy alone. We categorized patients into 3 groups ≥2 versus 1 versus 0 antianginals. We compared patient characteristics, QoL metrics, and cardiovascular end points at baseline and at 5 years, creating a multivariable model to adjust for key clinical confounders. Of 2,368 patients, 348 patients (14.7%) were on 0 antianginals, 1,020 patients (43.1%) were on 1 antianginal, and 1,000 patients (42.2%) were on ≥2 antianginals at baseline. The most common antianginal class was ß blockers. At baseline, patients on 0 antianginals had better QoL metrics (self-health score, Duke activity status index, and energy rating) than patients on ≥2 antianginals. However, at the 1-year follow-up, patients taking only 1 antianginal showed greater QoL improvement than those taking 0 antianginal, without any incremental benefit in QoL metrics seen in patients taking ≥2 antianginal agents, even after adjusting for multiple covariates such as age, heart failure, diabetes control, and myocardial jeopardy index. Lastly, at the 5-year follow-up, after adjustment, there were no differences in all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or myocardial infarction between patients taking different numbers of antianginals. Adults on a single antianginal for SIHD and diabetes mellitus had similar or better improvements in QoL than those on 2 or more antianginal agents at 1 year of follow-up. These findings merit further research to better understand the impact of medical therapy intensity on QoL in patients with SIHD and associated co-morbidities.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fármacos Cardiovasculares / Isquemia Miocárdica / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fármacos Cardiovasculares / Isquemia Miocárdica / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article