Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A meta-analysis of healthy lifestyle interventions addressing quality of life of cancer survivors in the post treatment phase.
Leske, Morgan; Galanis, Christina; Koczwara, Bogda; Beatty, Lisa.
Afiliación
  • Leske M; College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia. morgan.leske@flinders.edu.au.
  • Galanis C; College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Koczwara B; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Beatty L; Department of Medical Oncology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 Jan 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206430
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study's primary aim was to investigate whether including a mental health component to healthy lifestyle interventions are associated with greater effects on quality of life (QoL) for post-treatment cancer survivors than addressing physical activity and/or nutrition alone.

METHODS:

PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomised control trials of healthy lifestyle interventions for post-treatment cancer survivors, with a usual care or waitlist control, and measured QoL. Meta-analyses quantified the effects of interventions vs controls at post-treatment on total QoL, physical, emotional, and social well-being. Subgroup analyses compared interventions with vs without a mental health component, modes of delivery, and duration. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.

RESULTS:

Eighty-eight papers evaluating 110 interventions were included 66 effect sizes were extracted for meta-analysis, and 22 papers were narratively synthesised. The pooled effect size demonstrated a small, significant effect of healthy lifestyle interventions in comparison to control for all QoL outcomes (total g = 0.32, p >.001; physical g = 0.19, p = 0.05; emotional g = 0.20, p >.001; social g = 0.18, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between interventions with vs without a mental health component. Face-to-face delivered interventions were associated with greater total QoL and physical well-being compared to other modalities. Interventions delivered ≤12 weeks were associated with greater physical well-being than those delivered ≥13 weeks. Overall, studies had substantial levels of heterogeneity and 55.9% demonstrated high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS:

Participating in a healthy lifestyle intervention following cancer treatment improves QoL. Few trials addressed mental health or evaluated online or telephone modalities; future research should develop and evaluate interventions that utilise these features. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Brief healthy lifestyle interventions can be recommended for cancer survivors, particularly those interested in improving physical well-being.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia