Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anatomical registration of intracranial electrodes. Robust model-based localization and deformable smooth brain-shift compensation methods.
Blenkmann, Alejandro Omar; Leske, Sabine Liliana; Llorens, Anaïs; Lin, Jack J; Chang, Edward F; Brunner, Peter; Schalk, Gerwin; Ivanovic, Jugoslav; Larsson, Pål Gunnar; Knight, Robert Thomas; Endestad, Tor; Solbakk, Anne-Kristin.
Afiliación
  • Blenkmann AO; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; RITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time, and Motion, University of Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: ablenkmann@gmail.com.
  • Leske SL; Department of Musicology, University of Oslo, Norway; RITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time, and Motion, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Neuropsychology, Helgeland Hospital, Mosjøen, Norway.
  • Llorens A; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Université de Franche-Comté, SUPMICROTECH, CNRS, Institut FEMTO-ST, 25000 Besançon, France; Université Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiat
  • Lin JJ; Department of Neurology and Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA.
  • Chang EF; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
  • Brunner P; Department of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA; National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Albany, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Schalk G; Department of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA; National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Albany, NY, USA; Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute, Chen Frontier Lab for Applied Neurotechnology, Shanghai, China; Fudan University/Huashan Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Shang
  • Ivanovic J; Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
  • Larsson PG; Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
  • Knight RT; Department of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  • Endestad T; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; RITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time, and Motion, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Neuropsychology, Helgeland Hospital, Mosjøen, Norway.
  • Solbakk AK; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; RITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time, and Motion, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Neuropsychology, Helgeland Hospital, Mosjøen, Norway.
J Neurosci Methods ; 404: 110056, 2024 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224783
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intracranial electrodes are typically localized from post-implantation CT artifacts. Automatic algorithms localizing low signal-to-noise ratio artifacts and high-density electrode arrays are missing. Additionally, implantation of grids/strips introduces brain deformations, resulting in registration errors when fusing post-implantation CT and pre-implantation MR images. Brain-shift compensation methods project electrode coordinates to cortex, but either fail to produce smooth solutions or do not account for brain deformations. NEW

METHODS:

We first introduce GridFit, a model-based fitting approach that simultaneously localizes all electrodes' CT artifacts in grids, strips, or depth arrays. Second, we present CEPA, a brain-shift compensation algorithm combining orthogonal-based projections, spring-mesh models, and spatial regularization constraints.

RESULTS:

We tested GridFit on ∼6000 simulated scenarios. The localization of CT artifacts showed robust performance under difficult scenarios, such as noise, overlaps, and high-density implants (<1 mm errors). Validation with data from 20 challenging patients showed 99% accurate localization of the electrodes (3160/3192). We tested CEPA brain-shift compensation with data from 15 patients. Projections accounted for simple mechanical deformation principles with < 0.4 mm errors. The inter-electrode distances smoothly changed across neighbor electrodes, while changes in inter-electrode distances linearly increased with projection distance. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

METHODS:

GridFit succeeded in difficult scenarios that challenged available methods and outperformed visual localization by preserving the inter-electrode distance. CEPA registration errors were smaller than those obtained for well-established alternatives. Additionally, modeling resting-state high-frequency activity in five patients further supported CEPA.

CONCLUSION:

GridFit and CEPA are versatile tools for registering intracranial electrode coordinates, providing highly accurate results even in the most challenging implantation scenarios. The methods are implemented in the iElectrodes open-source toolbox.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Electroencefalografía Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Methods Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Electroencefalografía Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Methods Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article