Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Scaling up a home-visiting program for child development in Brazil: a comparative case studies analysis.
Buccini, Gabriela; Gubert, Muriel Bauermann; de Araújo Palmeira, Poliana; Godoi, Lídia; Dal'Ava Dos Santos, Laura; Esteves, Georgiana; Venancio, Sonia Isoyama; Pérez-Escamilla, Rafael.
Afiliación
  • Buccini G; Department of Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Public Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
  • Gubert MB; Department of Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Public Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
  • de Araújo Palmeira P; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
  • Godoi L; Federal University of Campina Grande, Department of Health, Cuité, Paraíba, Brazil.
  • Dal'Ava Dos Santos L; University of São Paulo, Graduate Program in Public Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Esteves G; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
  • Venancio SI; Department of Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Public Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
  • Pérez-Escamilla R; Ministry of Health, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 29: 100665, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235370
ABSTRACT

Background:

In 2016, Brazil scaled up the Criança Feliz Program (PCF, from the acronym in Portuguese), making it one of the largest Early Childhood Development (ECD) programs worldwide. However, the PCF has not been able to achieve its intended impact. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to achieving the PCF implementation outcomes across the RE-AIM dimensions (Reach, Effectiveness or Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

This comparative case study analysis selected five contrasting municipalities based on population size, region of the country, implementation model, and length of time implementing the PCF. We conducted 244 interviews with PCF municipal team (municipal managers, supervisors, home visitors), families, and cross-sectoral professionals. A rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify themes across RE-AIM dimensions.

Findings:

Families' limited knowledge and trust in PCF goals were a barrier to its reach. While the perceived benefit of PCF on parenting skills and ECD enabled reach, the lack of referral protocols to address social needs, such as connecting food-insecure families to food resources, undermined effectiveness. Questions about whether the social assistance sector should be in charge of PCF challenged its adoption. Implementation barriers exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic included low salaries, temporary contracts, high turnover, infrequent supervision, lack of an effective monitoring system, and nonexistence or non-functioning multisectoral committees. The absence of institutionalized funding was a challenge for sustainability.

Interpretation:

Complex intertwined system-level barriers may explain the unsuccessful implementation of PCF. These barriers must be addressed for Brazil to benefit from the enormous reach of the PCF and the evidence-based nurturing care principles it is based upon.

Funding:

NIH/NICHD.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Reg Health Am Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Reg Health Am Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos