Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of FAST in detecting intraabdominal bleeding in major trauma with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures: a retrospective cohort study.
Jensen, Lasse Rehné; Possfelt-Møller, Emma; Nielsen, Allan Evald; Singh, Upender Martin; Svendsen, Lars Bo; Penninga, Luit.
Afiliación
  • Jensen LR; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Possfelt-Møller E; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Nielsen AE; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Section, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Singh UM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Section, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Svendsen LB; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Penninga L; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. luit.penninga@regionh.dk.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(3): 1479-1486, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253932
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a tool to rapidly detect intraabdominal and intrapericardial fluid with point-of-care ultrasound. Previous studies have questioned the role of FAST in patients with pelvic fractures. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of FAST to detect clinically significant intraabdominal hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fractures.

METHODS:

We included all consecutive patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures treated our Level 1 trauma center from 2009-2020. We registered patient and fracture characteristics, FAST investigations and CT descriptions, explorative laparotomy findings, and transfusion needs. We compared FAST to CT and laparotomy findings, and calculated true positive and negative findings, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS:

We included 389 patients. FAST had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 98%, a PPV of 84%, and a NPV of 96% for clinically significant intraabdominal bleeding. Patients with retroperitoneal hematomas were at increased risk for laparotomy both because of True-negative FAST and False-positive FAST.

CONCLUSION:

FAST is accurate to identify clinically significant intraabdominal blood in patients with severe pelvic fractures and should be a standard asset in these patients. Retroperitoneal hematomas challenge the FAST interpretation and thus the decision making when applying FAST in patients with pelvic fractures.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos Pélvicos / Heridas no Penetrantes / Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Óseas / Fracturas de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos Pélvicos / Heridas no Penetrantes / Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Óseas / Fracturas de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca