Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of Perampanel in Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus with Suspected Inflammatory Etiology: A Case Series.
Nilo, Annacarmen; Vogrig, Alberto; Belluzzo, Marco; Lettieri, Christian; Verriello, Lorenzo; Valente, Mariarosaria; Pauletto, Giada.
Afiliación
  • Nilo A; Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
  • Vogrig A; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
  • Belluzzo M; Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
  • Lettieri C; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
  • Verriello L; Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
  • Valente M; Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
  • Pauletto G; Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 17(1)2023 Dec 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38256862
ABSTRACT
(1)

Background:

Increasing evidence supports the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective role of perampanel (PER), mediated by decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and by interference with apoptosis processes. Therefore, the use of PER to treat status epilepticus (SE) with suspected inflammatory etiology is appealing and deserves further investigation. (2)

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed seven patients (five F, two M; median age 62 years) with refractory and super-refractory SE due to a probable or defined inflammatory etiology and treated with PER. (3)

Results:

PER was administered as the third (4/7) or fourth drug (3/7), with a median loading dose of 32 mg/day (range 16-36 mg/day) and a median maintenance dose of 10 mg/day (range 4-12 mg/day). In five cases, SE was focal, while in two patients, it was generalized. SE was caused by systemic inflammation in three patients, while in the other four subjects, it was recognized to have an autoimmune etiology. SE resolution was observed after PER administration in all cases, particularly within 24 h in the majority of patients (4/7, 57.1%). (4)

Conclusions:

Our data support the efficacy of PER in treating SE when first- and second-line ASMs have failed and suggest a possible earlier use in SE cases that are due to inflammatory/autoimmune etiology.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia