Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The comparison of the Nursing Activities Score and TrendCare to accurately measure critical care nursing workload: A prospective observational design.
Pirret, Alison M; Corkery, Mary C; Gilhooly, Andrew; Devoy, Kathleen L; Strickland, Wharewaina.
Afiliación
  • Pirret AM; Critical Care, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand. Electronic address: Alison.Pirret@middlemore.co.nz.
  • Corkery MC; Critical Care, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand.
  • Gilhooly A; Critical Care, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand.
  • Devoy KL; Critical Care, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand.
  • Strickland W; Critical Care, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 81: 103568, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271856
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Intensive care units commonly use the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) to measure nursing workload, however, some settings use TrendCare. Historically 100 NAS points reflected one nurse, however research now suggests greater than 61 NAS points per nurse increases hospital mortality.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine if 1) TrendCare accurately reflects critical care nursing workload as measured by the NAS and 2) the required nursing hours calculated by each of the scoring systems differed between indigenous and non-indigenous patients.

METHODS:

Using a prospective observational design, data were collected between 9 August - 25 November 2021. Nursing workload was assessed over three shifts using TrendCare and the NAS.

RESULTS:

Analysis included 183 patients and 829 TrendCare and NAS scores. The mean NAS for intensive care patients was >61 on all three shifts (morning M = 67.1 ± 18.2, afternoon M = 66.1 ± 18.1, night M = 64.0 ± 18.1). The mean NAS for high dependency patients (morning M = 46.1 ± 11.1, afternoon M 45.9 ± 11.0, night Mdn 46.1 [40.5-54.1]) identified a nursepatient ratio of 12 reflected a NAS >90. The NAS and TrendCare found no difference in nursing hours between indigenous and non-indigenous patients, however higher scores for respiratory (H = 7.3, p = <.01), cardiovascular (H = 12.7, p = <.001) and renal (H = 12.7, p = <.001) support, and care for relatives and patients (H = 13.8, p = <.001) on some shifts were identified in indigenous patients.

CONCLUSION:

TrendCare nursing hours likely reflect a 11 nurse patient ratio for intensive care patients but likely under-estimates high dependency care nursing workload. The NAS activities highlighted some activities required more time for indigenous patients on some shifts. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE TrendCare likely reflects intensive care nursing workload but not high dependency nursing workload. A NAS of no greater than 61 points per nurse better reflects nursing workload in both the intensive and high dependency care units. Indigenous patients may require more nursing hours for nursing activities related to severity of illness.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos / Atención de Enfermería / Personal de Enfermería en Hospital Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos / Atención de Enfermería / Personal de Enfermería en Hospital Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article