Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the use of HL7 FHIR for implementing the FAIR guiding principles: a case study of the MIMIC-IV Emergency Department module.
van Damme, Philip; Löbe, Matthias; Benis, Nirupama; de Keizer, Nicolette F; Cornet, Ronald.
Afiliación
  • van Damme P; Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Löbe M; Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health & Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Benis N; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • de Keizer NF; Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Cornet R; Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health & Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
JAMIA Open ; 7(1): ooae002, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38283884
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To provide a real-world example on how and to what extent Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) implements the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) guiding principles for scientific data. Additionally, presents a list of FAIR implementation choices for supporting future FAIR implementations that use FHIR. Materials and

methods:

A case study was conducted on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Emergency Department (MIMIC-ED) dataset, a deidentified clinical dataset converted into FHIR. The FAIRness of this dataset was assessed using a set of common FAIR assessment indicators.

Results:

The FHIR distribution of MIMIC-ED, comprising an implementation guide and demo data, was more FAIR compared to the non-FHIR distribution. The FAIRness score increased from 60 to 82 out of 95 points, a relative improvement of 37%. The most notable improvements were observed in interoperability, with a score increase from 5 to 19 out of 19 points, and reusability, with a score increase from 8 to 14 out of 24 points. A total of 14 FAIR implementation choices were identified.

Discussion:

Our work examined how and to what extent the FHIR standard contributes to FAIR data. Challenges arose from interpreting the FAIR assessment indicators. This study stands out for providing a real-world example of a dataset that was made more FAIR using FHIR.

Conclusion:

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that formally assessed the conformance of a FHIR dataset to the FAIR principles. FHIR improved the accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of MIMIC-ED. Future research should focus on implementing FHIR in research data infrastructures.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: JAMIA Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: JAMIA Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos