Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medical Doctors Approaches and Understanding of Health Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review.
Louizou, Eleni; Panagiotou, Nikolaos; Dafli, Eleni; Smyrnakis, Emmanouil; Bamidis, Panagiotis D.
Afiliación
  • Louizou E; School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
  • Panagiotou N; School of Journalism & Mass Communications, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
  • Dafli E; School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
  • Smyrnakis E; Primary Health Care, General Practice and Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
  • Bamidis PD; School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
Cureus ; 16(1): e51448, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38298293
ABSTRACT
A physician's role is critical in fostering patient health literacy (HL) and influencing various aspects, including patient-physician communication and treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to analyze physicians' perspectives, comprehension, and management of HL. The focus of this review is on physicians' views, opinions, experiences, and strategies related to HL. We conducted comprehensive searches across seven databases, including PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Science Direct, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Original research articles published between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2020, were considered for inclusion. This literature review incorporates qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies, with a focus on extracting qualitative data. Among the 22 articles included in our review, we employed the method of inductive thematic analysis for data analysis. A detailed description of the review methodology can be found in a previously published protocol available through PROSPERO (CRD42020212599). The themes that emerged from the thematic analysis include (a) physicians' perception and management of HL; and (b) barriers. The results of the systematic review reveal that healthcare professionals exhibit varying perceptions of patients' HL levels and ascribe different meanings to it. However, none of them employ a specific measuring tool. While there appears to be no uniform approach to managing patients with low HL, some prioritize certain communication strategies, such as repetition, simplified language, and providing written instructions, among others. Most physicians cited multiple barriers that impede the development of patients' HL, including dysfunctions within the healthcare system, staff shortages, managing a large number of patients, limited time, work-related stress, cultural and socio-economic barriers, medical jargon, and language barriers. Considering the pivotal role of physicians in fostering patient HL, it is crucial to enhance medical education in addressing and managing HL, both within academic curricula and through continuing education seminars. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to improve healthcare professionals' working conditions, ensuring that each physician can allocate the necessary time to each patient based on their individual needs, without being hindered by stress-inducing work environments.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article