Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Digital interventions to promote psychological resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schäfer, Sarah K; von Boros, Lisa; Schaubruch, Lea M; Kunzler, Angela M; Lindner, Saskia; Koehler, Friederike; Werner, Tabea; Zappalà, Federico; Helmreich, Isabella; Wessa, Michèle; Lieb, Klaus; Tüscher, Oliver.
Afiliación
  • Schäfer SK; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany. sarah.schaefer@lir-mainz.de.
  • von Boros L; Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Diagnostics - Child and Adolescent Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany. sarah.schaefer@lir-mainz.de.
  • Schaubruch LM; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
  • Kunzler AM; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
  • Lindner S; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
  • Koehler F; Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Werner T; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Zappalà F; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
  • Helmreich I; Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute for Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Wessa M; Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Lieb K; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
  • Tüscher O; Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute for Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
NPJ Digit Med ; 7(1): 30, 2024 Feb 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332030
ABSTRACT
Societies are exposed to major challenges at an increasing pace. This underscores the need for preventive measures such as resilience promotion that should be available in time and without access barriers. Our systematic review summarizes evidence on digital resilience interventions, which have the potential to meet these demands. We searched five databases for randomized-controlled trials in non-clinical adult populations. Primary outcomes were mental distress, positive mental health, and resilience factors. Multilevel meta-analyses were performed to compare intervention and control groups at post-intervention and follow-up assessments. We identified 101 studies comprising 20,010 participants. Meta-analyses showed small favorable effects on mental distress, SMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.31, -0.18], positive mental health, SMD = 0.27, 95% CI [0.13, 0.40], and resilience factors, SMD = 0.31, 95% CI [0.21, 0.41]. Among middle-aged samples, older age was associated with more beneficial effects at follow-up, and effects were smaller for active control groups. Effects were comparable to those of face-to-face interventions and underline the potential of digital resilience interventions to prepare for future challenges.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Digit Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Digit Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania