Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modified intraocular lens power selection method according to biometric subgroups Eom IOL power calculator.
Eom, Youngsub; Bae, So Hyeon; Yang, Seul Ki; Kim, Dong Hyun; Song, Jong Suk; Cooke, David L.
Afiliación
  • Eom Y; Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355, South Korea. hippotate@hanmail.net.
  • Bae SH; Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hippotate@hanmail.net.
  • Yang SK; Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Clinic Building B, 1365B Clifton Road, Atlanta, NEGA, 30322, USA. hippotate@hanmail.net.
  • Kim DH; Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355, South Korea.
  • Song JS; Space Optics Laboratory, Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cooke DL; Satellite System 3 Team, Hanwha Systems Co., Ltd., Yongin­si, Gyeonggi­do, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4228, 2024 02 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378801
ABSTRACT
This study evaluates the accuracy of a newly developed intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation method that applies four different IOL power calculation formulas according to 768 biometric subgroups based on keratometry, anterior chamber depth, and axial length. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in at Korea University Ansan Hospital. A total of 1600 eyes from 1600 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and a ZCB00 IOL in-the-bag implantation were divided into two datasets a reference dataset (1200 eyes) and a validation dataset (400 eyes). Using the reference dataset and the results of previous studies, the Eom IOL power calculator was developed using 768 biometric subgroups. The median absolute errors (MedAEs) and IOL Formula Performance Indexes (FPIs) of the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Ladas Super, SRK/T, and Eom formulas using the 400-eye validation dataset were compared. The MedAE of the Eom formula (0.22 D) was significantly smaller than that of the other four formulas, except for the Barrett Universal II and Ladas Super formulas (0.24 D and 0.23 D, respectively). The IOL FPI of the Eom formula was 0.553, which ranked first, followed by the Ladas Super (0.474), Barrett Universal II (0.470), Holladay 1 (0.444), Hoffer Q (0.396), Haigis (0.392), and SRK/T (0.361) formulas. In conclusion, the Eom IOL power calculator developed in this study demonstrated similar or slightly better accuracy than the Barrett Universal II and Ladas Super formulas and was superior to the four traditional IOL power calculation formulas.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Facoemulsificación / Lentes Intraoculares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Corea del Sur

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Facoemulsificación / Lentes Intraoculares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Corea del Sur