Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Target Vessel-Related Outcomes in Patients Managed With Branch Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Repair.
Nana, Petroula; Panuccio, Giuseppe; Rohlffs, Fiona; Spanos, Konstantinos; Torrealba, Jose I; Kölbel, Tilo.
Afiliación
  • Nana P; German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Panuccio G; German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Rohlffs F; German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Spanos K; German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Torrealba JI; German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Kölbel T; German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
J Endovasc Ther ; : 15266028241231905, 2024 Feb 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380515
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Data on target vessel (TV)-related outcomes in patients managed with branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (BTEVAR) are limited. This study aimed to present the TV-related outcomes of BTEVAR in patients managed for aortic arch pathologies at 30 days and during follow-up.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients, managed between September 1, 2011, and June 30, 2022, with custom-made aortic arch endografts (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), presenting at least one branch configuration, were eligible. Primary outcomes were technical success, TV-related patency, and reinterventions at 30 days.

RESULTS:

In total, 255 TVs were revascularized using branches 107 innominate arteries (IAs), 108 left common carotid arteries (LCCAs), and 40 left subclavian arteries (LSAs). Covered stents were used as bridging stents of which 10.2% were balloon expandable. Relining, using bare-metal stents (BMS), was performed in 14.0% of IAs, 35.2% of LCCAs, and 22.5% of LSAs. Technical success on case basis was 99.2%; no failure was related to unsuccessful TV bridging. At 30 day follow-up, no TV occlusion was detected. In 5.6% of cases, a type Ic or III endoleak, attributed to TVs, was recorded. Two patients needed early branch-related reintervention. The mean follow-up was 18.3±9.2 months. Freedom from TV instability was 94.6% (standard error [SE] 2.5%] at 12 months. No TV stenosis or occlusion was detected up to 48 months of follow-up. Freedom from TV-related reinterventions was 95.4% [SE 2.4%] at 12 months.

CONCLUSION:

TV stenosis or occlusion in BTEVAR cases is rare and TV-related reinterventions and instability events are mainly attributed to type Ic and III endoleak formation. CLINICAL IMPACT Previous studies focusing on target vessel (TV) outcomes after endovascular aortic arch repair are limited. In this study, including 255 TVs revascularized using branched arch devices, bridging was performed with covered stents, of which 90% were self-expanding. Relining was at the discretion of the operator and was 14% for the innominate, 35.2% for the left common carotid and 22.5% for the left subclavian artery branches. No 30-day occlusion was detected. The freedom from TV instability was almost 95% at 12 months. TV instability and reintervention were mainly attributed to endoleaks type Ic and IIIc.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania