Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient barriers and facilitators for making environmental and behavioral modifications for dry eye in the United States.
Saldanha, Ian J; Petris, Rebecca; Ifantides, Cristos; Hauswirth, Scott G; Gregory, Darren G; Qureshi, Riaz; McCann, Paul; Liu, Su-Hsun; Abraham, Alison G; Li, Tianjing.
Afiliación
  • Petris R; Dry Eye Foundation, Poulsbo, Washington, DC.
  • Ifantides C; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Hauswirth SG; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Gregory DG; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • McCann P; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Optom Vis Sci ; 101(2): 84-89, 2024 Feb 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408305
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Managing dry eye disease (DED) is expensive. Often, prescribed treatments improve clinical signs but not patient-reported symptoms. In large surveys, clinicians and patients ranked environmental and behavioral modifications among the most important DED-related research priorities. Our purpose was to investigate the barriers to and facilitators of use of these modifications by patients with DED in the United States and how their use may be impacted by socioeconomic status (SES).

METHODS:

Using Qualtrics, we conducted an anonymous online survey of adults with DED living in the United States in August to September 2022. Patients were identified through the Dry Eye Foundation, Sjögren's Foundation, and a DED clinic in Colorado. We used an established index for classifying respondent SES based on education, household income, and employment. Outcomes included use of environmental and behavioral modifications and barriers to and facilitators of their use.

RESULTS:

We included 754 respondents (SES 382 low, 275 high, and 97 unclear). Most were aged 18 to 49 years (67%), female (68%), and White (76%) and reported dealing with DED for ≤5 years (67%). The most frequent modifications were taking breaks to rest eyes (68%), increasing water intake (68%), and using hot/cold compresses (52%). For these three, the biggest facilitators were as follows belief that the modification works (27 to 37%), being recommended it (24 to 26%), and ease of use/performance (21 to 32%). Across modifications, the biggest barriers were difficulty of use (55%), lack of family/employer/social/community support (33%), and lack of awareness (32%). The data do not suggest discernible patterns of differences in barriers or facilitators by SES.

CONCLUSIONS:

Greater emphasis should be placed on explaining to patients how environmental and behavioral modifications might mitigate DED. Employers and members of patients' support systems should be guided regarding how best to support patients in managing DED symptoms.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndromes de Ojo Seco Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Optom Vis Sci Asunto de la revista: OPTOMETRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndromes de Ojo Seco Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Optom Vis Sci Asunto de la revista: OPTOMETRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article