Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigating the effect of providing monetary incentives to participants on completion rates of referred co-respondents: An embedded randomized controlled trial.
Dunn, Abby; Alvarez, James; Arbon, Amy; Bremner, Stephen; Elsby-Pearson, Chloe; Emsley, Richard; Jones, Christopher; Lawrence, Peter; Lester, Kathryn J; Morson, Natalie; Perry, Nicky; Simner, Julia; Thomson, Abigail; Cartwright-Hatton, Sam.
Afiliación
  • Dunn A; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Alvarez J; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Arbon A; University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Bremner S; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Elsby-Pearson C; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Emsley R; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Jones C; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Lawrence P; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Lester KJ; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Morson N; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Perry N; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Simner J; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Thomson A; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
  • Cartwright-Hatton S; University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun ; 38: 101267, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419810
ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of a second informant (co-respondent) is a common method of identifying potential bias in outcome data (e.g., parent-report child outcomes). There is, however, limited evidence regarding methods of increasing response rates from co-respondents. The use of financial incentives is associated with higher levels of engagement and follow-up data collection in online surveys. This study investigated whether financial incentives paid to index participants in an online trial of a parenting-focused intervention, would lead to higher levels of co-respondent data collection.

Methods:

A study within a trial (SWAT) using a parallel group RCT design. Participants in the host study (an RCT of an online intervention) were randomised into one of two SWAT arms received/did not receive a £15 voucher when referred co-respondent completed baseline measures. Primary outcome was completion (No/Yes) of Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS or SCAS-Pre) at baseline. Additional analysis explored impact of incentives on data quality.

Results:

Intention to treat analysis of 899 parents (183 co-respondents) in the no-incentive arm, and 911 parents (199 co-respondents) in incentive arm. Nomination of co-respondents was similar between incentive arms. The RR for the incentive arm compared to the no incentive arm was 1.13 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.41, p = 0.264) indicating that incentives did not impact completion of outcomes by consented co-respondents. There were no indications of different data quality between arms.

Discussion:

The finding that payment of financial incentives to index participant does not lead to greater levels of co-respondent outcome completion suggests that careful consideration should be made before allocating resources in this way in future trials. Trial registration The host study was registered at Study Record | ClinicalTrials.gov and the SWAT study was registered in the SWAT Store | The Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research (qub.ac.uk) SWAT number 143 Filetoupload,1099612,en.pdf (qub.ac.uk).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido