Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing a virtual reality head-mounted display to on-screen three-dimensional visualization and two-dimensional computed tomography data for training in decision making in hepatic surgery: a randomized controlled study.
Preukschas, Anas Amin; Wise, Philipp Anthony; Bettscheider, Lisa; Pfeiffer, Micha; Wagner, Martin; Huber, Matthias; Golriz, Mohammad; Fischer, Lars; Mehrabi, Arianeb; Rössler, Fabian; Speidel, Stefanie; Hackert, Thilo; Müller-Stich, Beat Peter; Nickel, Felix; Kenngott, Hannes Götz.
Afiliación
  • Preukschas AA; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Wise PA; Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bettscheider L; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Pfeiffer M; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Wagner M; Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstrasse 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Huber M; Department for Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Fiedlerstraße 23, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
  • Golriz M; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Fischer L; Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstrasse 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Mehrabi A; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Rössler F; Department of Surgery, Hospital Mittelbaden, Balgerstrasse 50, 76532, Baden-Baden, Germany.
  • Speidel S; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Hackert T; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital of Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Müller-Stich BP; Department for Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Fiedlerstraße 23, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
  • Nickel F; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kenngott HG; Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Surg Endosc ; 38(5): 2483-2496, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456945
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Evaluation of the benefits of a virtual reality (VR) environment with a head-mounted display (HMD) for decision-making in liver surgery.

BACKGROUND:

Training in liver surgery involves appraising radiologic images and considering the patient's clinical information. Accurate assessment of 2D-tomography images is complex and requires considerable experience, and often the images are divorced from the clinical information. We present a comprehensive and interactive tool for visualizing operation planning data in a VR environment using a head-mounted-display and compare it to 3D visualization and 2D-tomography.

METHODS:

Ninety medical students were randomized into three groups (111 ratio). All participants analyzed three liver surgery patient cases with increasing difficulty. The cases were analyzed using 2D-tomography data (group "2D"), a 3D visualization on a 2D display (group "3D") or within a VR environment (group "VR"). The VR environment was displayed using the "Oculus Rift ™" HMD technology. Participants answered 11 questions on anatomy, tumor involvement and surgical decision-making and 18 evaluative questions (Likert scale).

RESULTS:

Sum of correct answers were significantly higher in the 3D (7.1 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) and VR (7.1 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) groups than the 2D group (5.4 ± 1.4) while there was no difference between 3D and VR (p = 0.987). Times to answer in the 3D (644 ± 0222 min, p < 0.001) and VR (624 ± 0243 min, p < 0.001) groups were significantly faster than the 2D group (0913 ± 0310 min) while there was no difference between 3D and VR (p = 0.419). The VR environment was evaluated as most useful for identification of anatomic anomalies, risk and target structures and for the transfer of anatomical and pathological information to the intraoperative situation in the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS:

A VR environment with 3D visualization using a HMD is useful as a surgical training tool to accurately and quickly determine liver anatomy and tumor involvement in surgery.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Imagenología Tridimensional / Realidad Virtual Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Imagenología Tridimensional / Realidad Virtual Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania