Intramammary lipopolysaccharide challenge in early- versus mid-lactation dairy cattle: Immune, production, and metabolic responses.

ABSTRACT

Study objectives were to compare the immune response, metabolism, and production following intramammary LPS (IMM LPS) administration in early and mid-lactation cows. Early (E-LPS; n = 11; 20 ± 4 DIM) and mid- (M-LPS; n = 10; 155 ± 40 DIM) lactation cows were enrolled in an experiment consisting of 2 periods (P). During P1 (5 d) cows were fed ad libitum and baseline data were collected, including liver and muscle biopsies. At the beginning of P2 (3 d) cows received 10 mL of sterile saline containing 10 µg of LPS from Escherichia coli O111B4/mL into the left rear quarter of the mammary gland, and liver and muscle biopsies were collected at 12 h after LPS. Tissues were analyzed for metabolic flexibility, which measures substrate switching capacity from pyruvic acid to palmitic acid oxidation. Data were analyzed with the MIXED procedure in SAS 9.4. Rectal temperature was assessed hourly for the first 12 h after LPS and every 6 h thereafter for the remainder of P2. All cows developed a febrile response following LPS, but E-LPS had a more intense fever than M-LPS cows (0.7°C at 5 h after LPS). Blood samples were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after LPS for analysis of systemic inflammation and metabolism parameters. Total serum Ca decreased after LPS (26% at 6 h nadir) but did not differ by lactation stage (LS). Circulating neutrophils decreased, then increased after LPS in both LS, but E-LPS had exaggerated neutrophilia (56% from 12 to 48 h) compared with M-LPS. Haptoglobin increased after LPS (15-fold) but did not differ by LS. Many circulating cytokines were increased after LPS, and IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, MCP-1, and IP-10 were further augmented in E-LPS compared with M-LPS cows. Relative to P1, all cows had reduced milk yield (26%) and DMI (14%) on d 1 that did not differ by LS. Somatic cell score increased rapidly in response to LPS regardless of LS and gradually decreased from 18 h onwards. Milk component yields decreased after LPS. However, E-LPS had increased fat (11%) and tended to have increased lactose (8%) yield compared with M-LPS cows throughout P2. Circulating glucose was not affected by LPS. Nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) decreased in E-LPS (29%) but not M-LPS cows. ß-Hydroxybutyrate slightly increased (14%) over time after LPS regardless of LS. Insulin increased after LPS in all cows, but E-LPS had blunted hyperinsulinemia (52%) compared with M-LPS cows. Blood urea nitrogen increased after LPS, and the relative change in BUN was elevated in E-LPS cows compared with M-LPS cows (36% and 13%, respectively, from 9 to 24 h). During P1, metabolic flexibility was increased in liver and muscle in early lactating cows compared with mid-lactation cows, but 12 h after LPS, metabolic flexibility was reduced and did not differ by LS. In conclusion, IMM LPS caused severe immune activation, and E-LPS cows had a more intense inflammatory response compared with M-LPS cows, but the effects on milk synthesis was similar between LS. Some parameters of the E-LPS metabolic profile suggest continuation of metabolic adjustments associated with early lactation to support both a robust immune system and milk synthesis.