Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Population-level interventions for the primary prevention of dementia: a complex evidence review.
Walsh, Sebastian; Wallace, Lindsay; Kuhn, Isla; Mytton, Oliver; Lafortune, Louise; Wills, Wendy; Mukadam, Naaheed; Brayne, Carol.
Afiliación
  • Walsh S; Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Wallace L; Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Kuhn I; University of Cambridge Medical School Library, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.
  • Mytton O; Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
  • Lafortune L; Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Wills W; Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
  • Mukadam N; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London W1T 7BN, UK.
  • Brayne C; Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
EClinicalMedicine ; 70: 102538, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38495526
ABSTRACT
Dementia risk reduction is a global public health priority. Existing primary prevention approaches have favored individual-level interventions, with a research and policy gap for population-level interventions. We conducted a complex, multi-stage, evidence review to identify empirical evidence on population-level interventions for each of the modifiable risk factors identified by the Lancet Commission on dementia (2020). Through a comprehensive series of targeted searches, we identified 4604 articles, of which 135 met our inclusion criteria. We synthesized evidence from multiple sources, including existing non-communicable disease prevention frameworks, and graded the consistency and comprehensiveness of evidence. We derived a population-level intervention framework for dementia risk reduction, containing 26 high- and moderate-confidence policy recommendations, supported by relevant information on effect sizes, sources of evidence, contextual information, and implementation guidance. This review provides policymakers with the evidence they need, in a useable format, to address this critical public health policy gap.

Funding:

SW is funded by a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellowship. WW and LF are part funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido