Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-intensity focused ultrasound with visually directed power adjustment for focal treatment of localized prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Peretsman, Samuel J; Emberton, Mark; Fleshner, Neil; Shoji, Sunao; Bahler, Clinton D; Miller, Larry E.
Afiliación
  • Peretsman SJ; , Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Emberton M; Interventional Oncology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Fleshner N; Department of Surgical Oncology Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Shoji S; Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
  • Bahler CD; Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Miller LE; Miller Scientific, 3101 Browns Mill Road, Ste 6, #311, Johnson City, TN, 37604, USA. larry@millerscientific.com.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 175, 2024 Mar 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507093
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To characterize patient outcomes following visually directed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for focal treatment of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review of cancer-control outcomes and complication rates among men with localized prostate cancer treated with visually directed focal HIFU. Study outcomes were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model.

RESULTS:

A total of 8 observational studies with 1,819 patients (median age 67 years; prostate-specific antigen 7.1 mg/ml; prostate volume 36 ml) followed over a median of 24 months were included. The mean prostate-specific antigen nadir following visually directed focal HIFU was 2.2 ng/ml (95% CI 0.9-3.5 ng/ml), achieved after a median of 6 months post-treatment. A clinically significant positive biopsy was identified in 19.8% (95% CI 12.4-28.3%) of cases. Salvage treatment rates were 16.2% (95% CI 9.7-23.8%) for focal- or whole-gland treatment, and 8.6% (95% CI 6.1-11.5%) for whole-gland treatment. Complication rates were 16.7% (95% CI 9.9-24.6%) for de novo erectile dysfunction, 6.2% (95% CI 0.0-19.0%) for urinary retention, 3.0% (95% CI 2.1-3.9%) for urinary tract infection, 1.9% (95% CI 0.1-5.3%) for urinary incontinence, and 0.1% (95% CI 0.0-1.4%) for bowel injury.

CONCLUSION:

Limited evidence from eight observational studies demonstrated that visually directed HIFU for focal treatment of localized prostate cancer was associated with a relatively low risk of complications and acceptable cancer control over medium-term follow-up. Comparative, long-term safety and effectiveness results with visually directed focal HIFU are lacking.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos