Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Algorithm Training and Testing for a Nonendoscopic Barrett's Esophagus Detection Test in Prospective Multicenter Cohorts.
Iyer, Prasad G; Slettedahl, Seth W; Mahoney, Douglas W; Giakoumopoulos, Maria; Olson, Marilyn C; Krockenberger, Martin; Taylor, William R; Foote, Patrick; Berger, Calise; Leggett, Cadman; Wu, Tsung-Teh; Antpack, Eduardo; Falk, Gary W; Ginsberg, Gregory G; Abrams, Julian A; Lightdale, Charles J; Ramirez, Francisco; Kahn, Allon; Wolfsen, Herbert; Konda, Vani; Trindade, Arvind J; Kisiel, John B.
Afiliación
  • Iyer PG; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: iyer.prasad@mayo.edu.
  • Slettedahl SW; Division of Clinical Trials, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Mahoney DW; Division of Clinical Trials, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Giakoumopoulos M; Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Olson MC; Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Krockenberger M; Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Taylor WR; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Foote P; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Berger C; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Leggett C; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Wu TT; Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Antpack E; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health System, Austin, Minnesota.
  • Falk GW; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Ginsberg GG; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Abrams JA; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Lightdale CJ; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Ramirez F; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Kahn A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Wolfsen H; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Konda V; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Trindade AJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York.
  • Kisiel JB; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 22(8): 1596-1604.e4, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38513982
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) detection is invasive and expensive. Nonendoscopic BE/EAC detection tools are guideline-endorsed alternatives. We previously described a 5-methylated DNA marker (MDM) panel assayed on encapsulated sponge cell collection device (CCD) specimens. We aimed to train a new algorithm using a 3-MDM panel and test its performance in an independent cohort.

METHODS:

Algorithm training and test samples were from 2 prospective multicenter cohorts. All BE cases had esophageal intestinal metaplasia (with or without dysplasia/EAC); control subjects had no endoscopic evidence of BE. The CCD procedure was followed by endoscopy. From CCD cell lysates, DNA was extracted, bisulfite treated, and MDMs were blindly assayed. The algorithm was set and locked using cross-validated logistic regression (training set) and its performance was assessed in an independent test set.

RESULTS:

Training (N = 352) and test (N = 125) set clinical characteristics were comparable. The final panel included 3 MDMs (NDRG4, VAV3, ZNF682). Overall sensitivity was 82% (95% CI, 68%-94%) at 90% (79%-98%) specificity and 88% (78%-94%) sensitivity at 84% (70%-93%) specificity in training and test sets, respectively. Sensitivity was 90% and 68% for all long- and short-segment BE, respectively. Sensitivity for BE with high-grade dysplasia and EAC was 100% in training and test sets. Overall sensitivity for nondysplastic BE was 82%. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for BE detection were 0.92 and 0.94 in the training and test sets, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

A locked 3-MDM panel algorithm for BE/EAC detection using a nonendoscopic CCD demonstrated excellent sensitivity for high-risk BE cases in independent validation samples. (Clinical trials.gov NCT02560623, NCT03060642.).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esófago de Barrett / Algoritmos Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esófago de Barrett / Algoritmos Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article