Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Areas of consensus on unwarranted and warranted transfers between nursing homes and emergency care facilities in Norway: a Delphi study.
Wiik, Arne Bastian; Doupe, Malcolm Bray; Bakken, Marit Stordal; Kittang, Bård Reiakvam; Jacobsen, Frode Fadnes; Førland, Oddvar.
Afiliación
  • Wiik AB; Centre for Care Research, West. Western, Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway. arbaw@hvl.no.
  • Doupe MB; Centre for Care Research, West. Western, Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
  • Bakken MS; Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
  • Kittang BR; National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
  • Jacobsen FF; University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Førland O; Department of Medicine, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 374, 2024 Mar 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532452
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transferring residents from nursing homes (NHs) to emergency care facilities (ECFs) is often questioned as many are terminally ill and have access to onsite care. While some NH to ECF transfers have merit, avoiding other transfers may benefit residents and reduce healthcare system costs and provider burden. Despite many years of research in this area, differentiating warranted (i.e., appropriate) from unwarranted NH to ECF transfers remains challenging. In this article, we report consensus on warranted and unwarranted NH to ECF transfers scenarios.

METHODS:

A Delphi study was used to identify consensus regarding warranted and unwarranted NH to ECF transfers. Delphi participants included nurses (RNs) and medical doctors (MDs) from NHs, out-of-hours primary care clinics (OOHs), and hospital-based emergency departments. A list of 12 scenarios and 11 medical conditions was generated from the existing literature on causes and medical conditions leading to transfers, and pilot tested and refined prior to conducting the study. Three Delphi rounds were conducted, and data were analyzed using descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS:

Seventy-nine experts consented to participate, of whom 56 (71%) completed all three Delphi rounds. Participants reached high or very high consensus on when to not transfer residents, except for scenarios regarding delirium, where only moderate consensus was attained. Conversely, except when pain relieving surgery was required, participants reached low agreement on scenarios depicting warranted NH to ECF transfers. Consensus opinions differ significantly between health professionals, participant gender, and rurality, for seven of the 23 transfer scenarios and medical conditions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Transfers from nursing homes to emergency care facilities can be defined as warranted, discretionary, and unwarranted. These categories are based on the areas of consensus found in this Delphi study and are intended to operationalize the terms warranted and unwarranted transfers between nursing homes and emergency care facilities.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Transferencia de Pacientes / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Transferencia de Pacientes / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega